PII - NYSE

Good day. And welcome to the Polaris Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Call and Webcast. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the After today's presentation, there will be an To ask a question, you may press star, Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to J.C. Weigelt. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Betsy, and good morning or good afternoon, everyone. I'm J.C. Weigelt, Vice President of Investor Relations at Polaris. Thank you for joining us for our 2025 fourth quarter and full year earnings call. We will reference a slide presentation today, which is accessible on our website at ir.polaris.com. Joining me on the call today are Mike Speetzen, our Chief Executive Officer, and Bob Mack, our Chief Financial Officer. Both have prepared remarks summarizing our 2025 fourth quarter full year results as well as our expectations for 2026. And then we'll take your questions. During the call, we will be discussing various topics which should be considered forward-looking for the purpose of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results could differ materially from those projections in the forward-looking statements. You can refer to our 2024 10-Ks and other filings with the SEC for additional details regarding risks and uncertainties. All references to 2025 fourth quarter and full year actual results and future period guidance are for our continuing operations and are reported on an adjusted non-GAAP basis unless otherwise noted. Please refer to our Reg G reconciliation schedules at the end of the presentation for the GAAP to non-GAAP adjustments. Now, I will turn it over to Mike Speetzen. Go ahead, Mike.

Thanks, J.C. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. I'd like to start by acknowledging the resiliency of our Polaris team and the discipline of our strategy. These are qualities that transformed a challenging year and one that truly reflects the strength and resolve of our business. While tariffs represented the most significant challenge we have seen since the pandemic, we delivered nearly everything we said we would do and then some. We navigated difficult headwinds in 2025 while still delivering share gains, innovation, quality and operational improvements, portfolio realignments and strategic milestones that position us for long-term success. We achieved share gains in all segments last year, including off-road vehicles, snowmobiles, pontoons and motorcycles. This reflects both our commitment to innovation and the strength of our dealer partnerships. In ORV, we launched several new products from the R

Thanks, Mike, and good morning or good afternoon to everyone joining us today. Let's start with fourth quarter financial results. Adjusted sales for the quarter were up 9%, Similar to Q3, we saw higher shipments year over year with a notably stronger mix toward Ranger North Star side by sides. Net pricing was a modest headwind as elevated promotions continued to outpace price. International sales grew 9% with all regions contributing driven by double-digit growth in PG and A and on road. Globally, PG and A sales were up 20% supported by strength in factory-installed accessories and oil. Our ridership indicators, average miles per unit and dealer repair orders continue to trend positively which aligns with the growth we're seeing in oil revenue. Mix and volume are once again positive contributors to gross profits. However, those benefits were more than offset by $37 million in new tariffs and the normalization of incentive compensation relative to last year's unusually low level. Given these headwinds, adjusted EBITDA margin contracted year over year as expected. The primary drivers were the impact of tariffs on gross profit and incentive compensation flowing through both gross profit and operating expense. As Mike mentioned, we also incurred higher R&D costs in the quarter as we support work on our innovation pipeline. Stepping back, after backing out the impact of tariffs, our full year 2025 results would have exceeded the expectations we set last January. That's a testament to strong execution and controlling what we can control in an extremely dynamic environment. Off-road sales rose 11% in the quarter, supported by higher ORV shipments a richer mix of vehicles 22% PG and A growth. Dealer inventory was down 9% excluding youth in ORV, and more than 40% in snow. While we still have some work to do in snow, the volume of non-current sleds sold in Q4 should help ease some of the challenges from the last two poor snow seasons in the Flatlands. As Mike noted, dealer inventory overall is in a strong position across all metrics including day sales on hand, current versus non-current mix, and the split between utility and recreation products. We gained modest ORV share in the quarter excluding youth and multiple points in snow. Within ORV, utility and crossover remain our strongest categories, led by Ranger and Polaris Expedition. Without tariffs, gross profit margin would have improved supported by a richer shipment mix aligned to retail continued operational improvements across our plants. Moving to On Road, Sales during the quarter were up 4% driven by positive mix within Exim and GUPEEL overcoming softness in Indian Motorcycle and our Slingshot business. Adjusted gross profit margin was up 186 basis points driven by mix with a modest offset from tariffs. Marine sales rose 1% For Q4, the key indicator is next season order book strength, and we saw exactly that. Demand increased for our entry-level Bennington models, as well as our redesigned flagship Bennington QX pontoon lineup. Thanks to our dealer inventory actions over the past eighteen months, we believe marine inventory is now aligned with demand and we expect shipments in 2026 to be more closely aligned with retail. December SSI data showed the market share gains across our pontoon brands, The broader industry continues to face pressure from higher interest rates and macro uncertainty, but our positioning remains strong. Gross margin declined due to mix partially offset by positive net pricing. Moving to our financial position. Generated approximately $180 million in operating cash flow this quarter translating into $120 million of free cash flow. For the year, we generated $6.5 million of free cash flow. Our progress on working capital in 2025 is important to highlight. We reduced finished goods supported by clean build, lean initiatives improved forecasting tools that allow for more predictable build schedules, and stronger than planned retail. We believe these working capital levels are sustainable with further opportunity on the raw material material and payable sides. We remain committed to maintaining investment-grade metrics. We ended the year well below our covenant thresholds due to strong cash generation about $530 million of debt pay down in 2025. For 2026, we expect our leverage and interest coverage ratios to remain within covenant requirements even with the higher tariffs in the first half. Our capital allocation remains balanced between core growth investments with attractive returns and debt reduction. And we remain firmly committed to the dividend and our dividend aristocrat status as we just completed our thirtieth consecutive year of dividend increases. Today, we are introducing our full year 2026 guidance. There are two important assumptions. One, that the Indian Motorcycle separation closes by the end of this quarter Annualized, the benefit is about $1 of adjusted EPS but with a closing expected to occur near the end of the first quarter, the 2026 benefit is expected to be between $0.75 and $0.80 with the balance of EPS savings to equate to the annualized dollar being attributed to the Indian Motorcycle Q1 loss under our ownership. And two, that there are no changes to regulatory policy, including tariffs, relative to the policies in place today. With those assumptions, we expect total company sales to grow 1% to 3%, This incorporates a more challenging year over year comparison to more than $300 million from Indian Motorcycle sales that were included in last year's second, third and fourth quarters, but will not recur in 2026. That tougher comparable is offset by over $400 million of tailwinds from aligning shipments in retail. In addition, we expect a net pricing benefit to offset negative mix The net pricing benefit is due to normal model year price increases and a lower promotional environment. If you were to remove Indian Motorcycle sales from our 2025 expected 2026 results, this guidance would equate to 7% to 9% organic sales growth. We expect adjusted EBITDA margin to expand 80 to 120 basis points year over year driven by the aforementioned volume benefit and lean improvement initiatives across our facilities. While being partially offset by approximately $90 million in incremental tariffs. Other big pieces moving pieces impacting the year include the adjusted EBITDA benefit of three quarters without Indian Motorcycle, over $30 million of absorption benefit from operational efficiency improvements, Operating expenses are expected to be down approximately 4% due to the separation of Indian Motorcycle. We are also planning for modest increases in strategic investment across IT and innovation there should not be any material change in year over year compensation expense following normalization in 2025. In other income, we expect $30 million to $35 million of income due to transition service agreements or TSAs will be put in place to help ensure the smooth separation of Indian Motor Cycle into an independent company. Some examples of TSAs that are expected to be in place are for IT systems, supply agreements and freight. These TSAs are in place to neutralize the cost we are incurring within cost of sales and operating expenses to help stand up Indian Motorcycle independently with the majority of the agreements expected to expire in nine to twelve months. Putting this all together, we expect adjusted EPS of 1.5 to $1.6 for 2026. This includes a modest benefit from FX and interest expense. For Q1 specifically, Indian Motorcycles is expected to be included in our results for a significant portion of the quarter. Sales are expected to grow more than 10%. Tariffs will represent a significant headwind of approximately $45 million Adjusted EPS is expected to be approximately negative $0.45 In summary, Q4 played out largely as expected. Excluding the impact of tariffs, we exceeded what we said we would do in 2020 including share gains and healthier dealer inventory. Operationally, we gained efficiencies within our manufacturing facilities, generated $741 million in operating cash and paid off approximately $530 million in debt. Much of this was overlooked in such a dynamic macro environment last year. But as Mike said, it's good to close the book on 2025 It was a uniquely challenging year, but I'm incredibly proud of how our team executed, stayed focused delivered against our long-term objectives. We entered 2026 playing offense. We expect this year to reflect the start of what is to come as we continue to on our longer-term initiatives of mid-single-digit sales growth mid to high teens EBITDA margin double-digit EPS growth and mid-20s ROIC. I look forward to sharing our progress with you as we move into the spring and throughout the year. With that, I will turn the call back over to Mike to wrap up. Go ahead, Mike.

Thanks, Bob. We've been clear and consistent about our strategy over the past several years. Strengthen our global leadership in powersports while improving the profitability and returns of the business. Our strategy is designed not just to make us more profitable, but to make us more resilient across cycles. So as Polaris succeeds, our dealers succeed and our customers continue to enjoy the best products in the industry. A major part of our strategy has been delivering the best customer experience and rider-driven innovation through our portfolio of iconic brands. With our recent share gains and the success of products like R

Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. On your touch-tone phone. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. And you would like to withdraw your question, please press star then 2. The first question today comes from Joe Altobello with Raymond James. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Hey, Good morning. I guess first question for you, Bob. I think you just mentioned that the revenue lift in 'twenty six from wholesale and retail being in alignment north of $400 million I think that number was around $300 million last quarter. So did something change? Or is that just more visibility there? And should we assume some sort of flow through of around 25%? On that number?

Yes, Joe. Yes, so the number did increase where we thought it would be last quarter because we had a really strong Q4 and although we expect retail to be relatively flat, you're obviously off of a bit of a higher base. And you know, as you as you think about the flow through, it's, the math gets complicated. Because you gotta look at it sort of ex tariffs. But if you took the tariffs out, and we've got about $20 million of commodities headwind, So if you sort of added back the impact of $90 ish million of incremental tariffs and 20 million of commodities the flow through would actually be closer to 40%, which I really think shows how much progress we've made in our plants over the last couple of years. As Mike said in his prepared remarks, we were down in Mexico a week or two ago, and it was really heartwarming to see how great the plants are running now. Yes, Joe. I mean, I would want to stress that 40% incremental. I worked in industrial companies pretty much my whole career. And that's not a number that happens easily. And I think when you look at our operations, we effectively have one lien line at each factory. And that doesn't mean that we're not getting lien benefits in other parts of the factory, but we are still early in journey. Our first pass yield in terms of getting product through the line cleanly is still it's much better than it has been historically, but we've still got significant improvements sitting in front of us. And while our quality has improved, and a 20% reduction in cost is nothing to blink an eye at. I'm still not happy with where we stand, and I think there's a lot more that we can do. So the opportunity in front of us, it's frustrating because a lot of it gets blurred by the massive tariff load that we've got on the business. The good news is we've got an incredible team focused on moving us away from high tariff countries That doesn't mean that all the cost comes out of the system. Because you're likely not moving to someone who's priced at the same level supplier out of Asia. But the team can then start working value engineering projects and really put us in a good position over the long term to get our margins up into that mid to high teen EBITDA. Range.

Got it. Very helpful. Maybe just a follow-up. You've given us a lot of building blocks for twenty six. But it does seem like your guidance implies some level of cost saves. I know you mentioned 30 million of absorption, for example. Is there anything beyond the $30 million that's built into that guidance?

In terms of cost takeout, obviously the math with Indian starts to get relatively complicated with it coming out in the first quarter. But ex Indian, we're expecting GP to be down slightly. And a lot of that is driven by the accounting for the TSAs. And I know that's kind of been confusing to everybody. But the way these things are accounted for under GAAP there's about $90 million that'll float through COGS. And about 20 that'll go through ops. Or 15 that'll go through OpEx. And we'll recover that in different lines. So we'll get about $60 million of it in sales, about 10 million of it in COGS and about 35 million in other income. Really what flows through other income are things like if we're billing them for providing IT services or even freight sometimes because it's commingled the GAAP rules work, it has to go through other income. So that's kind of about a 30 bps headwind to our GP. Ex Indian, But that stuff will all fall off you know, through the course of the year and going into '27 should be relatively clean It's not like those costs will not the recoveries won't continue and the costs won't continue. So there's not a really a go forward impact there, but it will sort of distort GPs in 2026. And but if you think about the fact that the what we've got for incremental tariffs, nearly $90 million ex Indian 100 million as reported with Indian in Q1. Plus we talked about $20 million of commodities inflation that we see right now. Being able to offset that and effectively being flat, I think is better performance than it looks like on paper. Yeah. I think, Joe, on the TSA front, we didn't have them to the extent that we do with Indian with some of the prior divestitures, those businesses were really somewhat self-contained Indian was so incredibly embedded and the teams have done significant work to extract as best we can. The management team will be leaving the facility. They've got a new facility. We've cordoned off engineers. But the reality is to get it done right, we want to make sure the business is set up. So we've got a variety of these things that span largely six to twelve months. And a really skilled team that's helping manage that And our number one priority is we want to make sure that there's minimal disruption as the business comes out. And that it's set up in a way that it can sustain and continue to grow.

Got it. Okay. Thank you.

The next question comes from Craig Kennison with Baird. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Thanks for taking my question. So, Bob, in a year when you needed to generate cash, you generated quite a bit On Slide 30, it shows adjusted free cash flow over 600 million I'm wondering what your thoughts are on 2026 free cash flow and maybe if you could shed some light on working capital and CapEx expectations.

Yeah. So obviously, a ton of progress on working capital in 2025. I think for 2026, we're going to have some kind of competing issues. Finished goods will probably go up a little just because revenue is going up and shipments are going up. We're going to look to try to hold raw flat to down then continue to make some progress on payables to drive working capital a little bit lower. I don't think you'll see we won't be able to sustain the massive progress that was made in 'twenty five. And the progress in 'twenty five really was combination of a lot of things, right? It was all the lean stuff we're doing at the plants. So we put in a lot of new forecasting tools in '24, which helped us better forecast the model mix, which again helped control inventory. Also really just kind of cleaned up a lot of the stuff coming out of COVID, right? Just the the craziness of COVID and the builds and and all the volatility in '24. As you recall, we shut down really slowed in the back half of '24, so we exited with high level of finished goods. We corrected that in '25, which we had committed to do. So we really executed on the things we said we do with working capital. So 2026 you know, that benefit probably won't be quite as high. But you know? So we're looking a cash flow standpoint Really to be more in the range of about $160 million of operating cash flow. And about 120 million of free cash flow. So we'll continue to work to improve that. It's just going to be tough to repeat the performance from 2026, but working capital will continue to be a big focus. We're getting close to being back to some of our kind of historic best working capital levels. But I think there's opportunity there as we continue to invest in our IT systems, improve our forecasting and Mark and the team continue to improve the operations of the factories.

Yes. Thanks, Bob. And as a follow-up could you give us a sense of your goals for financial leverage at the '26 Yes. So as you guys know, we went out in about the midyear last year, renegotiated our covenants. We got a year of covenant relief. So we're sitting with covenants in the fives for the first February. And we knew all along that the most challenging quarters from a covenant standpoint were going to be Q1 and Q2 this year because we're starting to pull in some of the lower tariff impacted EBITDA last year and the unimpacted quarters. That we had in 2025 are rolling off And obviously, we've got about a $90 plus million tariff headwind in the 2026. So we knew those were gonna be the most challenging. We were able to pay down a lot more debt obviously in 2025 than we had originally anticipated. So as we get through the year, we expect to be able get to be under our normal covenants that are in the the three five. Range. Through the back half of the year, and then we'll continue to pay down debt from there. I mean long term, as as EBITDA recovers through tariffs reduction and price, and debt comes down, we'd like to be back in that 1% to two range, which is our goal for being investment grade rated. But got a great relationship with our banks. We spend a lot of time with the rating agencies. Conversations have all been productive. Everybody understands the short-term impacts of the tariffs that can be offset with the moves out of Asia that Mike talked about. It just is gonna take some time. And so we'll continue to make progress on that in 2026 and start to really see the benefits of all those moves more in '27.

Thanks, Bob.

The next question comes from Tristan Thomas-Martin with BMO. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning. Just want to make sure I'm thinking about Indian the right way in '27 So it sounds like just about, like, TSA, a lot of this stuff drops off. And then the only thing we have to think about is that 20 to 25¢ of the dollar incremental in '27. Is that right?

Yes, that's right. I mean the TSAs might be a little bit of IT stuff that hangs on longer, but it won't be material. It'll be really easy to to show you guys when we get there. We just don't know Obviously, we're pushing to get out of the TSAs as fast as we can, and and the Indian team is doing the same. So everybody's goals are aligned there. Trying to be separate companies as soon as possible. So really, the only impact in '27, obviously, is the is the dollar, and it'll be we'll get all of it in '27 where we won't in '26 because we'll sell the business sometime in the quarter.

Okay. And then just one more. You called out can't remember that, seven to 9% organic sales growth. I kind of adjust for Indian and the $400 million it implies it $200 million at the midpoint. Can you maybe just talk to what's driving that then also maybe give us a little help around how you're thinking about off-road versus on-road versus marine? Thanks.

Yes. I mean, look, the big block math, when you strip Indian out on both sides is our revenue is up somewhere in that $400 to $500 million range. And we've got a little bit of price in there. That's our normal model year pricing that will that we put in place. The majority of that is really just simply the math of not under shipping retail. Which is essentially where we've been for the last couple of years. We pulled our dealer inventory down 17% overall with an off-road down 9%. And as we talked about, we've got the mix of that healthy, all those things. So we feel like our inventory is in a really good spot. So as we look through 2026 and we talk about a flat industry that puts us in a spot to be able to have build, ship and retail all aligned. And as a result of that, we pick up revenue on an incremental basis. I'd point you back to the comments we made We expect the strength really to maintain in utility We think the rec side is going to continue to be challenged. I think we're going to need more relief from an interest standpoint. I think we're going to need to see continued inflation reduction. And I do think that there's a lot going on in our country right now. And I think that that just has people kind of standing back and waiting if they if they don't absolutely have to make a purchase, they're not going to make it. The good news is, as we talked about, I mean, you've seen it show up on our PG and A results. I mean, we're moving a lot of wheels and tires and oil and parts and components And we know because we track RO activity, miles driven, people are still out using our products. So we know people are riding. And the good news is at some point in time, they're going to want to come in and get our latest and greatest on the rec side and got some pretty cool stuff there. And we feel good about what we're doing to set us up for the long term.

Great. Thank you.

The next question comes from James Hardiman with Citi. Please go ahead.

You guys have done a great job of sort of helping us bridge. I just want to make sure I have these pieces right, because, certainly, the the the wholesale piece is is bigger than, I think, most of us thought. So you're talking about four mill $400 million top line 40% flow through on that. That's a $160 million. So that's almost $2 right there. You've got another, call it, $75.80 cents coming from Indian, and then you've got some cost savings, some commodities that may be offset And then the rest is ultimately to to get to that, call it, buck 55 bridge from 25 to 26. The rest of that is just tariffs. Correct? Like, not missing any pieces there? And commodities. Tariffs, commodities, and a little bit of lift in OpEx as we invest more in engineering and IT IT. Once you pull Indian out.

Got it. And then sort of that $90 million tariff number, maybe I was doing the math wrong, last quarter. That's a little bit higher than what I thought you guys were saying a quarter ago. Did that number change at all And I guess to this obviously, you don't have a crystal ball in terms of where things are gonna go. But, specifically, the the the tariffs that Mexico has put on China doesn't seem like you think that's gonna be particularly impactful to your numbers. Maybe walk us through sort of what the the latest is there, what your lawyers are saying, and and if you feel confident that that's never gonna be a piece that ultimately gonna impact you. Thanks. Yes. Well, so look, I we're obviously still awaiting what the Supreme Court may come through. And obviously, the team's got a plan of action because there's a lot of complexity they were to rule against president Trump We are obviously off still working the lobbying angle as aggressively as we can or look, I give our team a lot of credit for we're small compared to the majority of these companies that are up getting air time, in DC. And, you know, I think our team has done a really good job of getting in front of USTR and commerce and the executive team there. So, you know, we're we're not backing off. We're gonna continue to put on it. As best we can. And certainly, if something were to break there, that would be tremendous. I mean, got over $200 million worth of tariff in our business right now. And when you add all that together, it's darn close to $3 worth of earnings. That's really frustrating for us when we see all the benefits and the operational improvements and they just are getting dwarfed. So we're going to take matters into our own hands like we always do. We'll keep working all those angles that require someone else to act on. But we've got a team. We've quoted pretty much 100% of what comes out of China. And now we're working and we've got we got meetings every couple of weeks. We're looking at the amount of transition that we've got. Getting that material cost of goods sold from China, from 18% down to less than five by the time we get into 2027 is that's not easy work. There's a fair amount of revalidation and things that have to go into that and the team is aggressively going after it. I actually think we're going to turn it into a net positive. I think we're going to find opportunities for localizing the supply chain Back to the earlier question about cash flow, that's going to give us working capital and quite frankly, flexibility in responsiveness that we don't have today because the lead times are so long with product being on on the ocean for, you know, four to six weeks. Making its way over here. So I think we'll be able to turn into a positive, but it is it's a very real load on the business financially and we're working every angle we can to mitigate that.

But to clarify, you don't think I'm sorry. Go ahead.

We thought it would be about $100 million of incremental tariff impact. So in our view, it's come down a little bit. But the $20 million of commodities is new and that's obviously where commodities sit today and that moves around and we do hedge But there just has been a lot of pressure on commodities. A lot of that is tariff driven, right, There's different tariffs on steel and aluminum and other commodities, you know, that that puts pricing pressure on stuff that you're sourcing out of The US. Which is primarily where we buy all that stuff. So total for the year ex Indian, we're looking at at $215 million of tariffs on the business. In so it's still a big drag when you include the old three zero one stuff that came in last year.

But you guys, just to clarify, don't think that the Mexico tariff on China will ultimately gonna impact you. No. We don't. You know, this they put tariffs on, you know, a pretty defined group of parts. And as of right now, that hasn't impacted us. I mean, there's we it's hard to foresee the future in this tariff environment. But we don't believe right now that's going to be a significant impact.

No. And we're in we're participating in the comment process for the USMCA and knock on wood, there hasn't been a whole lot of drama associated with that. So I think think the administration understands the importance of the relationship with Mexico. And to Bob's point, Mexico, this isn't new. They've always had some level of restrictions, maybe not always tariffs, but employment requirements. And etcetera that they've tried to slow down some proliferation of the Chinese suppliers in Mexico.

Got it. That's really helpful. Thanks, guys.

Thanks. The next question comes from Noah

Hi, thanks for taking my questions. I guess first in terms of, kind of inventory levels across the industry, I think this time last year there were really, like, kind of a couple offenders in terms of making the channel heavier. So if you could just kind of speak to what the channel looks like maybe relative to last year and just expand on on how you guys are feeling about your position? Thanks. Yes. Look, I feel really good about where we're at. When you look at us and the next largest competitor together, we make up probably 60% of the industry. We are both pretty much in parity from a day's sales outstanding or inventory on hand, current, non-current, the data we have would suggest we probably have the healthiest mix. But with 60% of the industry in a good spot, that is certainly helpful to dealers. That said, we still do see some pockets, where some of the Japanese competitors are struggling. It tends to move around quarter to quarter as to exactly who that is. I don't want to get into naming names. We know who they are. We know where our overlaps are. It's more of a nuisance to the dealer. The volumes that those products have, most of them are less than 10% market share. So it's not creating substantial financial headwinds for the dealers. It's just more of something that they've got to deal with. We know we spend every quarter we meet with our dealer council and they are incredibly appreciative of the work that we've done, the fact that we set expectations August '4 and drove hard to get there By the '4 and then to 'twenty five, we've held we've stayed consistent with what we told them. We've done a lot of work. When we talk about health of dealer inventory, there's been tremendous work done during the course of 2025 to make sure that we have the right inventory. Having the day sales at 100 or less is one thing, but it's the mix of inventory, making sure we get the right stuff at the right dealership, We've talked about the aged inventory We've taken the inventory that's greater than one hundred and eighty days down almost 60%. That's all helpful because it's not just taking the interest burden off, but allows them to focus on being able to move product and make healthier margins. And so we feel good about that setup and still a couple of players out there that got a little work to do, but thankfully they're a relatively smaller part of the industry.

Great. Maybe just one more. Obviously, we've kind of talked about this, but if you could just remind us kind of what of what are the pieces to consider when we're thinking about kind of 400,000,000 plus volume benefit a flat retail environment, like, we're kind of the pockets of kind of lighter inventory. Thanks. Well, I mean, I I guess I'd step back and say we feel good about the inventory level at the dealers for both ORV and marine. And so both businesses have an opportunity as we move forward even in a flat environment to have growth. Because we're now at a build ship retailer all equal. And so largely, it's driven off of that And then I would just say that the utility segment remains strong. So don't expect big things from the rec side, but we do think that the utility will have enough growth to help offset any weakness that we see on the on the rec side.

Really helpful. Thank you.

The next question comes from Robin Farley with UBS. Please go ahead.

Great. Thank you. Just it's interesting with the benefit here to your EPS from the Indian sale. Can you help us think about you're still going to have Slingshot in your on-road business. What kind of EPS drag is Slingshot? If we think about what you'll have when everything is fully separated from Indian, just to kind of think about what the EPS impact from Slingshot is. Thanks.

Yes. And Robin, I'm going to take the opportunity to answer your question a little more broadly because you're introducing kind of the thoughts around the portfolio. And I'm going get to the slingshot answer here in a second. But we've heard a fair amount of noise out in the environment around our marine business. And I just want to go on the record that we have zero intention of divesting the Marine business. We know that many of our competitors tried to wade into the marine space and struggled. We have an excellent business and it's an excellently run business. And I'll remind you that back in 2020, when the pandemic first hit, we took the opportunity and we shed three brands that were underperforming. Leaving us with Bennington, Godfrey and Hurricane, which are all number one or number two in their category. And you've seen the performance over the past couple of years, in terms of refreshing the portfolio and the share gains that we've had The business has returned over 80% of the original purchase price. And even at low points that we've been in the industry, the business is still making a lot of cash flow. And so I just want to I want to quell some of the noise that's been out there. And largely we feel good our portfolio now. We've gone through and really pulled out a lot of underperforming businesses. There's always going to be things within the portfolio. We've got far more refined at how we look at things financially. Slingshot has been heavily impacted over the past couple of years. It is our most interest rate sensitive business, highest level of financing and with interest rates being high as well as consumers being somewhat stretched with inflation and just other interest payments. That business has slowed down. Significantly. And so we have been losing money. I'm not going to get into the specifics. It's not material. To the company. And we have an aggressive plan on how we're going to resolve that moving forward. And similar to what we've talked about in the past, if we can't get things to where they need to be, then we'll obviously take action. But I'm not ready to make any declaration relative to that. Slingshot's a really neat business. It's an important component of our adventures. Offering. Those Those products tend to rent really well. On both coasts. And so, we're in a product refresh cycle. And so, over the next couple of years, I think you're to see improved performance coming from that business. And we'll continue to look in different aspects of our company, aftermarket brands etcetera, and make sure that we've got the right level of returns across portfolio. But I think you can rest assured there are no big remaining moves left for us to make this point.

Great. Thank you for that super thorough Appreciate that. Maybe just one small follow-up. And maybe more one for Bob. Just a small one on your guidance for margin. Are you assuming that mix is going to be a benefit or a drag this year? I'm just thinking specifically in the ORV business with Ranger 500 a little bit more mid-sized. Just how is that factored into your guide, a higher mix of that? Thanks.

Yes, I would we think mix is going to be a headwind this year. We had really strong NorthStar retail and NorthStar shipments to kind of get, you know, keep up with that demand. In Q3, Q4. And so we'll we'll see how that the North Star mix plays out going into into 2026, but it's certainly a strong tailwind in 2025 and I don't know if it'll sustain quite that well in 2026. The Ranger 500, to your point, selling really well, really popular with customers and dealers. But that is a bit of a a margin headwind. And then we've got a little bit just in the mix in Rec. We've also got some kind of inter product mix headwind Marine starts to shift to retail which will recover and that's a headwind to GP. It's really not EBITDA, but it's definitely a headwind to GP as Mike was saying, it's a strong business, but it's structurally the GPs are lower because the OpEx is significantly lower. EBITDA margins in the business are actually pretty good. But it will be an a mix headwind to GP and then snow. You know, snow while improving snow is just structurally a little bit lower GPs than, than off road. And so as snow starts to recover, we're not gonna have a huge snow build year in 2026. We said that in our prepared remarks, we're going to be cautious going through 2026 into the 2027 season and really try to make sure we get inventory where we want it. We've made good progress this year, but there'll be a little bit of headwind from So you'll see some headwinds in mix, but some of that's offset by we expect the promotional environment slow down a little bit. As, you know, a lot there's a lot of promo in the channel in '25 as it related to clearing inventory, and now we're kind of more just into trying to get retail because everybody the Japanese are a little heavy, as Mike said, but inventory is in a better place. So we'll see some positive there. And then also which is our normal price increases that we hadn't put through in a few years. So, you know, we've got a little bit of price going in also to help offset that mix.

Okay, great. Thank you very much.

The next question comes from Johnson with Seaport Research Partners. Please go ahead.

All right. Thank you. Good morning, everybody. In the past, you've given us explicit guidance on the segments. Top line up or down low single digits whatnot. I know you've given us a lot of bits and pieces to kind of put the puzzle together but can you give us sort of guidance for 2026 on the three segments and how you expect top line? To perform?

We're not ready to do that, Gerrick. Just with the complexity of Indian moving out and we will be reevaluating our segments in the first quarter and we may make some changes to how the segments fall. So our our plan would be to update that guidance either on the the Q1 call in April or, if the opportunity presents itself, we may do it at a conference ahead of that depending on the timing of the Indian sale. But we've given the guidance we're gonna give right now for 2020. I mean, Gerrick, the way the way to think about it is, you know, we're we're trying to get the Indian transaction closed sooner rather than later. So whenever that happens, there's obviously going to be updates to guidance in terms of we've made the assumption that's a full quarter worth of revenue and loss. And if I were a betting guy, I'd say it's probably going to be something less than that. So when we are able to come out with that, we'll also share the new segmentation of the business and be able to provide more color at that point in time.

Okay. Okay. And then on utility, you mentioned utility strength, and that's been ongoing. But next year or actually, should say this year, it looks like there's some benefits to small businesses, construction, farmers, ranchers with bonus depreciation and other goodies out of the one big beautiful bill. So what kind of impact you're anticipating from the incentives there?

I mean, that's largely what we think is going to keep that utility segment. I mean there's other aspects, obviously, with all the innovation. But we do think that those are the utility segment is where most of that benefit comes through. And so we've got programs that are specifically targeted that What we have not assumed is some significant uptick across the rec side from higher tax returns, etcetera. We've scoured the data and it's tough to know exactly where and how that's going to come through. And which customer segment it could potentially impact. Whether or not that money actually goes to buying discretionary products as opposed to people deleveraging and cleaning up credit card bills and things like that. So we've got the factories in a much better spot so we can respond. Hopefully, we're responding to an uptick in volume, but at this point, we're we're not making that call. Yes. I mean, if you look at data, you would think that rec this should be about the time, the buyers from kind of the COVID era start to rebuy and we see in the data that they're still riding their vehicles. Oil sales have been strong. We talked about that earlier in the call. But we're not baking that in. We've got some great new products out there, the XPS, the updated ProR, But until we see data different, we expect rec to continue to to, you know, be a challenge side of the industry with better opportunity in utility.

Okay. Thank you.

The next question comes from Scott Stember with ROTH Capital. Please go ahead.

Morning. Thanks for taking my questions, guys. Questions on off-road outside of Indian, it looks like Gupheel and Aksum are really doing well. Could you talk about how that fits into your guidance for '26 Yes. I mean they look, I missed part of your question. It sounds like it was on the GUPEL exome business. Yes, yes. That the share could have. Majority of the guidance move is our ORB and marine. Businesses. Okay. And then, on the retail financing side, obviously, doesn't seem like we've gotten a lot of help. But have you seen through your relationships any budging on lending rates with with the banks? Anything on the margin that you could share? Not really. Credit stats for the for the quarter and really for the full year were pretty consistent. When we ran aggressive promo financing, it it had the intended impact. So consumers are still looking for lower rates. Rates have come down a little certainly at the better end, you know, if you're in the you know, seven hundred plus credit score range. But nothing nothing dramatic yet. And, you know, I think it's a it's tough to plan what the Fed's gonna do. It's bounced all over the map. So we're we're assuming not a lot of help fed wise in the year and that '26 will kinda be a lot like '25 where you know, promo rates will will help and people will choose between rebates and promo.

Gotcha. All I got. Thank you.