Thanks, Brian. Today, I will cover our second quarter 2022 financial results, review a few key valid points and provide an outlook for the third quarter. As Brian mentioned, our Q2 results capped off a strong first half performance. Revenue on the second quarter increased 185% year-over-year to $1.1 billion. With approximately 70% of the growth driven by higher volumes from increased market penetrations within our existing markets and new market expansions and approximately 30% to the increase in average sales price. We sold 2888 homes in the second quarter, a 129% increase year-over-year with an average sales price of $372,000 compared to $298,000 in Q2 of the prior year. Our acquisition of 3792 homes in the second quarter was consistent with a typical seasonal first second quarter increase. And as of June 30, we own 3561 home across 27 active markets. We reported second quarter gross profit of $93 million or 8.6% gross margin, net income of $11.6 million, adjusted net loss of $1 million and adjusted EBITDA of $13.7 million. Each of these amounts include the $21.2 million inventory impairment charge which I will discuss in more detail momentarily. As when this charge, each of this metrics would have been $21 million higher including adjusted EBITDA which would have come in at $34.9 million. Fully diluted earnings per share on a GAAP basis was $0.04 per share and includes a $0.04 benefit from marking-to-market the warrant value and an $0.08 charge from the inventory impairment. Coming back to discussion of the inventory valuation adjustment or impairment, at the end of every period we evaluate each home in our inventory to determine and the carrying values recoverable based on our expected sales proceeds. To the extent in that proceeds do not cover the carrying value, we recorded charge for that expected loss in the current period. Quarterly charges that range from $63,000 to $1.8 million over the last three years but generally well below 1% of the total inventory. At the end of June when we performed this assessment, some market such as Denver, Austin, and Phoenix, have experienced slowdown in demand for residential housing as a result of the combination of the rapid rise in mortgage rates and robust home price depreciation in that a market. While we are then making adjustments in the quarter to underwrite new acquisitions to incorporate wider spreads and lower sales price assumptions, the homes already in inventory were underwritten under very different market conditions. As such, we calculated the value given our current assessment with the best available information and then recorded in charge of $21 million in the quarter. Over the next couple of quarters as reseller inventory that was acquired under previous market conditions and replaces with homes that we acquire in the current environment, we expect to return to more normalized levels of returns. Returning to the discussion of our Q2 results, contribution margin after interest for the quarter came in the $28,500 for home or 70.6% of revenue and has been between 5% and 10% over the past eight quarters. In periods of price depreciation like we have experienced over the past few years, we have been able to absorb the increased input cost of acquiring homes at higher rates to not have sales prices on the back end. In more of the buyers' market, our attributes or convenience, certainty and control are even more highly valued by the perspective sellers, so we don’t need to lean on the home price depreciation to increase returns. By adjusting the variables in our underwriting process through the combination of our asset valuation models and in-market real-estate teams, we remain consistent with our expectation of generating annual contribution margin after interest up 3% to 6% and to increase that margin over the longer term. From an operating cost perspective, we continue to demonstrate the ability to leverage top line growth and increased efficiency to scale across the organization. For the quarter, sales marketing and operating cost improved 230 basis points year-over-year to 6% of revenue. Our technology in development cost improved 40 basis points year-over-year. G&A had a slight increase of 14 basis points year-over-year to a 1.5% of revenue. The prior year period cost for G&A do not include the public company cost which began in our Q3 2020 public company combination. In addition to the financial metrics I just addressed, there are several other key data points we monitor closely to assess our performance. We have previously shared that our goal is to keep our average time to cash full at 100 days. In stronger market, that metric has dropped down into the mid-60s. And with [sober] conditions, we would expect to be at or slightly above that mark. In the second quarter, our time to cash was 83 days which improved from a seasonally higher 96 days that we saw in Q1. This marks our eighth consecutive quarter with time to cash flow 100 days. Another important metric is our inventory aged over 180 days. As Brian mentioned, as of June 30 we were less than 2% aged well below our target of being under 10%. This is a strong inventory position as we enter this period of changing market conditions. With the softening of the market, we do expect our aged inventories to increase from the exceptionally low current levels. Inventory turnover will continue to be a key focus of the company in the second half of the year. From a capital structure perspective, we continue to make positive structures. In June, we added $200 million of our rent capacity under one of our credit facilities and expanded the maturity date to June 2024. In July, we increased borrowing capacity with one of our mezzanine debt facilities by over $30 million and also extended the maturity to June of '24. We now have access to $1.9 billion of inventory financing capacity across eight different facilities. Lastly, our cash balance at June 30 was $155 million. We are proactively adjusting our operations to reflect the changing needs of our customers and our company as the real-estate market shifts. Over the next couple of quarters as e work through the process of selling inventory homes that we expect to produce lower margins due to the change in market conditions. We expect to rebuild that inventory with homes acquired at values more reflective of recurring environment. With continued strong request volume and an established track record in our markets, we believe we are well-positioned. Specifically for the third quarter, we expect to sell between 1700 and 2200 homes, generating revenue of between $600 million and $800 million. We also expect adjusted EBITDA will reflect the variability in market conditions and will trend down in the short-term between negative $20 million and negative $40 million. Our guidance ranges are a bit lighter than our norm this quarter given the current market conditions. As we built up the technology scale and expertise at Offerpad in the past seven years, we entered this term from a solid position. The geographic diversification of our inventory, low level of aged inventory, differentiation of our renovations model, minimal supply chain constraints and an improved balance sheet all support our ability to manage through the transition period. Fundamentally, our investment pieces remain the same with a large addressable market, focussed business model, competitive differentiation and an attractive growth for a while. We are confident in our ability to adjust in the short-term and to deliver long-term value to our customers and our shareholders. I'll now turn the call back to Brian for some concluding remarks.