MATX - NYSE

Good day and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Matson First Quarter 2023 Financial Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers’ presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today’s conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Lee Fishman, please go ahead.

Thank you, Felicia. Joining me on the call today are Matt Cox, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; and Joel Wine, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Slides from this presentation are available for download at our website, www.matson.com, under the Investors tab. Before we begin, I would like to remind you that during the course of this call, we will make forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Federal Securities Laws regarding expectations, predictions, projections or future events. We believe that our expectations and assumptions are reasonable. We caution you to consider the risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements in the press release, the presentation slides and this conference call. These risk factors are described in our press release and presentation and are more fully detailed under the caption Risk Factors on Pages 14 to 24 of our Form 10-K filed on February 24, 2023, and in our subsequent filings with the SEC. Please also note that the date of this conference call is May 04, 2023, and any forward-looking statements that we make today are based on assumptions as of this date. We undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements. I’ll now turn the call over to Matt.

Okay, thanks Lee, and thanks to those on the call. I will start on Slide 3. Despite being down from the extraordinary pandemic driven demand level over the last two years, Matson’s ocean transportation and logistics business segments performed well in a challenging business environment. For the first quarter within ocean transportation, our China service generated lower year-over-year volume and freight rates, which were the primary contributors to the decline in our consolidated operating income. We also saw lower year-over-year volumes in Hawaii, Alaska and Guam compared to the year ago period. In logistics, operating income decreased year-over-year, primarily due to lower contributions from supply chain management and transportation brokerage. I will now go through the first quarter performance of our tradelanes, SSAT and logistics, so please turn to the next slide. Hawaii container volume for the first quarter decreased 0.8% year-over-year, primarily due to lower eastbound volume. For the quarter, we saw muted growth in westbound volume and we saw a steadier level of retailer related freight demand consistent with pre-pandemic trends. Volume in the first quarter of 2023 was 0.9% higher than the volume achieved in 2019. Please turn to Slide 5. Hawaii’s economic – economy continues to grow from strong tourism trends and low unemployment, but is slowing. UHERO’s March projections continue to show economic growth in 2023, supported by continued strength in total tourism and a relatively low unemployment rate. UHERO projects weakness in domestic tourist arrivals from weakening macroeconomic conditions to be countered by continued improvement in international tourist trends. Unemployment is expected to raise a little as the economy responds to the effects of higher interest rates to subdue inflationary pressures. Despite UHERO’s view of continued economic growth in the near term, we expect muted freight demand. In the medium-term, the trajectory of economic growth in the state remains uncertain given the negative trends as a result of higher inflation and higher interest rates. Moving to our China service on Slide 6. Matson’s volume in the first quarter of 2023 was 35.4% lower year-over-year, primarily due to no CCX service in the quarter and lower demand for our CLX and CLX+ services. Nearly two-thirds of the year-over-year volume decline was related to the CCX service in the year ago period. Matson continued to realize a significant rate premium over the Shanghai Containerized Freight Index in the first quarter of 2023. We achieved freight rates that were lower than in the year ago period, but higher than those achieved in the first quarter of 2019. Please turn to Slide 7. In the first quarter, our retail customers continued to conservatively manage the inventories amid weakening consumer demand, increasing interest rates and economic uncertainty. As we noted on our fourth quarter earnings call in the weeks post Lunar New Year, we saw light demand for our China service and as a result, we decided not to sail the CLX+ vessel from Shanghai for a few weeks. Currently in the Transpacific business conditions are mixed with general improvement in tradelane capacity and some improvement in retailer inventories. Regarding tradelane capacity, we have seen more short-term capacity management in the form of blank sailings. Within our scope of expedited ocean, we have seen one competitor terminate its West Coast bound service. On the demand side, we continue to see conservative inventory management by our retail customers in light of the economic uncertainty. Given the conservatism in inventory management, retail inventories could become quite tight to the extent consumer demand stabilizes or firms up, which could drive incremental short-term demand for our expedited services. Looking ahead, for the second quarter we expect our CLX and CLX+ services to reflect freight demand levels below normalized conditions with lower year-over-year volumes and lower freight rate environment. Absent an economic hard landing in the U.S., we expect improved trade dynamics in the second half of 2023 as the Transpacific marketplace transitions to a more normalized level of demand. Regardless of the economic environment, we expect to continue to earn a significant rate premium to the SCFI reflecting our fast and reliable ocean services and unmatched destination services. Please turn to the next slide. This slide is a summary of our China service offerings in the last couple of years and what we expect in 2023, 2024 and beyond. Our expedited service in the Transpacific have evolved through and beyond the pandemic to meet the demands from our customers. Out of the pandemic, we gained the CLX+ service as a permanent fast transit service into Southern California that complements our highly differentiated CLX offering. The Matson brand was enhanced during the pandemic with our CLX+ and CCX offerings as we responded quickly to our customers needs and provided reliable ocean and terminal services during a difficult period with port congestion and supply chain issues. Going forward, we will continue to uncover growth opportunities in the Transpacific by leveraging our brand and success with the CLX and CLX+ service. Given the vessel changes in the CLX string in the next couple of years, we expect the annual run rate of volume for the CLX to be approximately 60,000 to 65,000 containers until the three new Aloha Class vessels are in service in 2026 and 2027. As the new Aloha Class vessels enter the tradelane, we expect the CLX capacity to increase approximately 500 containers per vessel per voyage. For the CLX+ service, we expect the annual run rate of volume to also be approximately 60,000 to 65,000 containers. Please turn to Slide 9. In Guam, Matson’s container volume in the first quarter of 2023 decreased 10.9% year-over-year. The decrease was primarily due to lower retail related demand. Volume in the first quarter of 2023 was 3.9% lower than the level achieved in the first quarter of 2019. In the near-term, we expect muted freight demand in Guam despite continued improvement in the economy with increasing tourism and a low unemployment rate. There are also negative trends as a results of higher inflation and higher interest rates that create uncertainty in the economic growth trajectory. Please turn to the next slide. In Alaska, Matson’s container volume for the first quarter 2023 decreased 4.8% year-over-year. The decrease was due to lower export seafood volume from AAX, primarily due to three less sailings, lower southbound volume, primarily due to lower domestic seafood and household goods volume partially offset by higher northbound volume due to two additional sailings. Compared to the first quarter of 2019, volume in the quarter was 20.7% higher. The Alaska economy continues to show good growth and improvement in key indicators from the depths of the pandemic. In the near-term, we expect continued economic growth from continued job growth and increased energy related exploration and production activity. However, there are negative trends as a result of higher inflation and higher interest rates that create uncertainty in the economic growth trajectory. Please turn to Slide 11. Our terminal joint venture SSAT declined $35.8 million year-over-year to a negative $1.8 million. The lower contribution was primarily due to lower other terminal revenue and lower lift volume. SSAT saw significantly less detention and demurrage revenue in the quarter due to easing port congestion and lower lift volume consistent with lower demand in the Transpacific tradelane. For the second quarter of 2023, we expect lift volume to reflect the challenging environment in the Transpacific tradelane, we also expect significantly less detention and demurrage revenue than the year ago quarter. Absent an economic hard landing, we expect SSAT to trend to pre-pandemic profitability levels beginning in the second half of the year. Turning now to logistics on Slide 12. Operating income in the first quarter came in at $10.9 million or $5.5 million lower than the results in the year ago period. The decrease was primarily due to a lower contribution from supply chain management consistent with lower demand in the Transpacific tradelane and a lower contribution from transportation brokerage. In the near-term, we expect a mix of activity across the logistics line of business. We expect continued growth in Alaska to be supportive of our freight forwarding demand. We expect supply chain management to track our China service, so a challenging environment in the second quarter as I discussed previously. For transportation brokerage, we expect near-term challenges with lower freight demand driven primarily by retail customers continuing to manage down inventories, excess capacity, and declining accessorial fees. I will now turn the call over to Joel for a review of our financial performance.

Okay. Thanks, Matt. Please turn to Slide 13 for a review of our first quarter results. For the first quarter, consolidated operating income decreased $393.9 million year-over-year to $38.7 million with lower contributions from Ocean Transportation and Logistics of $388.4 million and $5.5 million respectively. The decrease in Ocean Transportation operating income in the first quarter was primarily due to lower freight rates in volume in China and a lower contribution from SSAT partially offset by lower operating costs and expenses including fuel related expenses primarily related to the discontinuation of the CCX service. The decrease in logistics operating income was primarily due to lower contributions from supply chain management and transportation brokerage. We had interest income of $8.2 million in the quarter due to higher cash investment rates on our cash and cash equivalents and cash deposits in the CCF as compared to no interest income in the prior year period. Interest expense in the quarter decreased $0.3 million year-over-year due to the decline in outstanding debt in the past year. The interest expense in the first quarter also includes the premium paid to retire two debt securities in the first quarter. The effective tax rate in the quarter was 23.1% compared to 21.1% in the year ago period. Please turn to the next slide. This slide shows how we allocated our trailing 12 months of cash flow generation. For the LTM period, we generated cash flow from operations of approximately $1,094.7 billion from which we used $137.9 million to retire debt, $145 million on maintenance and other CapEx, $53.4 million on new vessel CapEx, including capitalized interest and owner’s items, $623.7 million in cash deposits and interest income in the CCF net of withdrawals for milestone payments, $27.4 million on other cash flows – cash outflows, while returning $413 million to shareholders via dividends and share purchase. Please turn to Slide 15 for a summary of our share purchase program and balance sheet. During the first quarter, we repurchased approximately 0.7 million shares for a total cost of $42.1 million including taxes. As of April 26, we had 0.7 million shares remaining in the repurchase program. Since we initiated our share purchase program in August of 2021 through April 26 of this year, we have repurchased 8.3 million shares or approximately 19% of our outstanding shares for approximately $650 million. Last week, our board of directors approved adding 3 million shares to the existing program and extended the program end date to December 31, 2025. As we have said before, we are committed to returning excess capital to shareholders and plan to continue to do so in the absence of any large organic or inorganic growth investment opportunities. Turning to our debt levels, our total debt at the end of the quarter was $476.7 million. All of our outstanding debt is fixed rate. Our $650 million revolving credit facility is our only floating rate instrument, and it is undrawn as of quarter end. As of the end of the first quarter, the average interest rate on the outstanding debt was 2.04%. We reduced outstanding debt principle in the quarter by $40.8 million, of which $14.4 million was through regularly scheduled amortization, and the balance of $26.4 million was through the repayment in January, March of two Title XI securities. I’m now going to walk through an update on the Capital Construction Fund, so please turn to the next slide. As we mentioned on the fourth quarter earnings call, in February, we deposit $100 million in cash into the CCF and pledge the accounts receivable to reduce our taxable income in 2022. We currently do not expect to make additional cash contributions to the CCF until 2026. The cash balance in the CCF at the end of the quarter was $623.7 million. Based on the remaining milestone payments of roughly $949 million, nearly two-thirds of the program has been funded into the CCF. Note, that the two-thirds figure excludes interest income on cash deposits that may be earned in future years. The restricted cash in the CCF is currently held in a U.S. Treasury obligation fund with daily liquidity. At the end of the first quarter, securities held within the fund had a weighted average life of 35 days. We continue to expect a tax refund this year of approximately $119 million for the cash deposit into the CCF last year that was applied to the 2021 tax year. We expect the refund to be used for general corporate purposes and to be included in cash and cash equivalents on the balance sheet. And lastly, we expect to make our next milestone payment from the CCF in the second quarter in the amount of approximately $50 million. With that, I’ll now turn the call back over to Matt.

Okay. Thanks, Joel. Please turn to Slide 17, where I’ll go through some closing thoughts. We expect the consolidated operating income in the second quarter of 2023 to be higher than the first quarter. Normal seasonality trends are returning to our domestic trade lanes in logistics. As mentioned previously, in the second quarter, we expect to see freight demand for our China Service below normalized conditioned. In the near-term, we expect continued economic growth in Alaska to be supportive of improved freight demand, and in Hawaii and Guam, we expect muted freight demand. But we recognize the potential economic overhang that could negatively affect volumes in each of these core domestic markets. As I mentioned previously in the second half of the year in the Transpacific, we expect improved trade dynamics as the market transitions to a more normalized level of demand. In closing, Matson performed well in the first quarter. It was better than any first quarter in Matson’s history before the pandemic. Although, there is currently a lot of economic uncertainty, we feel very good about our balance sheet situation, our market positioning and ocean transportation and logistics, and the company’s potential earnings generation compared to pre-pandemic levels. The pandemic highlighted the benefits of our ocean service and logistics units to help our customers through a difficult period of supply chain infrastructure congestion. Within the Transpacific, our efforts to maintain service reliably and focus on our customers high level of demand, significantly expanded our China service and elevated the Matson brand. Going forward, we’re in a great financial and operating position to leverage the Matson brand to capitalize on growth opportunities as they emerge. And with that, I will turn the call back to the operator and ask for your questions.

Thank you. At this time, we will conduct the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] The first question comes from the line of Jack Atkins from Stephens. Jack, please go ahead.

Okay, great. Good evening guys. Thank you for taking my questions.

Sure, Jack.

So, Matt, if I could maybe start with something you said in your closing comments, and I appreciate now that things are beginning to at least stabilize somewhat here. You guys are providing a little more commentary on sort of your – the forward projections. But as you think about the second quarter and the comment that operating income on a consolidated basis would be higher sequentially, I guess, could you maybe kind of – and I’m – give us some high level thoughts on what will be driving that? Seasonality would suggest that your volumes in Hawaii would pick up a little bit, maybe the same in the China service. Could you maybe kind of give us some puts and takes in terms of what is going to be driving the higher operating income sequentially for you?

Yes, and I think you said it in the big part of it in your question. It’s really returning to more normal levels of seasonality. Typically, and as you know, Jack, from our business, typically we see the first quarter being the weakest, and the second is typically the second weakest. And then our strong two next quarters, the second and third quarter, tend to be our strongest. And those are really around seasonal patterns of – in the case of the Transpacific trades, the normal selling cycles and the holiday periods and how our customers demand levels in terms of retail sales and other drivers are reflected. So our own seasonality is really reflected in our customers as selling patterns. In the domestic tradelanes, you see a little bit of the same where you see more people travelers and economic demand in those two middle quarters by and large. And so, I think, we’re seeing seasonality being the bigger factor. Of course, we – and so it isn’t – we don’t think much of a stretch just to say that the second quarter is going to be higher. It almost always has been if you look back in our history. So those are – that’s the main driver, Jack.

Okay. Okay, Matt, I appreciate that. And I guess, as you sort of talk to your customers and kind of get a feel for what’s going on within their business to think about how you should plan for the future. I – what are you hearing from your customers around their expectations for the peak shipping season in the Transpacific? Or do you think we’re going to be back to more normal replenishment patterns by that time? Or is it still too early to make that call?

Yes, I mean, - of course our customers share some of the same uncertainties that we live in. There’s the macro as we’re all watching issues around continued rising interest rates and some of the knock on effect of the regional banks as associated with those rate increases. And whether we’ll enter a recession or won’t we, those continue to be front of mind for our customers. And those are driving what I think are more cautious ordering patterns. And so what we’re seeing is a level of caution and not to be overstocked. I personally feel that we are making, our customers are that is making improvements in managing through their inventory overhang. I don’t think it’s done yet, but I think they are making steady progress on that. I think in our Transpacific trade, we continue to see strong demand for our expedited product, most of which is coming out of the air. I think if you look at e-commerce and other things that typically go by air, we’re seeing very strong volumes of e-commerce as our customers are trading out of air freight and moving it into our expedited product. So I think that’s a welcome sign. And I think that continues that trade down into our expedited ocean. We’ll continue to see support even in a period of economic uncertainty. So those are some of the factors I think that are driving our demand patterns.

Okay. No, that helps Matt. And I appreciate the longer term commentary around the volume dynamics in the Transpacific trade for you guys. If I kind of think about that, you’re sort of on that run rate currently in terms of that 60,000 to 65,000 container for each service level if we sort of think about what you did in the first quarter and kind of annualize that out. So, I guess, as you sort of think about your business today, do you feel like that the business is kind of on more of a – sort of a normal, I hate to use that word, but "normalized" run rate basis now? I mean, I know the economy is still challenged, freight rates aren’t great. But I mean all of that sort of pandemic fueled congestion, do you feel like that – that’s kind of come out and we’re seeing more of a baseline run rate for the business as we sit here today?

Yes, it’s a great question, Jack. From my perspective, I think the answer is we were pleased to see the level of demand in the Transpacific trades that we saw in the first quarter. It affirmed our hope that there would be a continued trade down out of air freight as our customers are trying to manage their transportation spend. So we were pleased to see the level of the expedited market allowing us to keep our CLX and CLX+ ships relatively full during the quarter except for the few weeks of the Lunar New Year period. And so I think to a certain extent, we feel good about our positioning in the market, but with the caveat that there continues to be a lot of uncertainty about whether we’re going to go into a recession or something else. But I would say absent, as we said in our prepared comments, absent a recession, we – I think we are starting to see the benefit of normalized trade volumes. I think the other thing, if you just look at the Transspecific capacity, not specific to Matson from a contextual standpoint. I think you’ve seen the lows have been reached. We hit bottom. Ocean freight rates have trended back up, not a significant amount, but at least we’ve hit bottom. We’re also seeing the international ocean carriers doing a relatively good job of managing capacity primarily as I mentioned in my prepared comments through the use of blank sailings. So that they’re deploying capacity to meet the market demand, but without a significant overhang in putting capacity in the market. So it’s good to see the behavior that we saw really frankly at the beginning of the pandemic when ocean carriers withdrew capacity with the expectation that there would be a freight recession, which then – when there wasn’t reintroduced that capacity. So it’s good to see the ocean carriers managing their capacity for the current level of demand. That’s somewhat encouraging. But again, there is still a lot of macro risks out there, but what we’re seeing is encouraging, frankly.

Okay. That’s great. I guess last question, and I’ll hand it over, but I guess looking outside of the Transpacific, which has been sort of a key focus here for the business for the last couple years, and thinking about Hawaii and that Jones Act lane. Matt, I guess, as you look out over the next couple years, where do you think – I understand that there are obviously issues around the economy and lending standards and things like that. But as you sort of think about the long-term construction cycle in Hawaii, do you think we’re kind of getting to a point where we’re going to need to see increased levels of construction activity? Obviously not in 2023, maybe not even 2024, but do you feel like there is sort of a – there’s a wave building there at some point? It feels like we – it’s been a while since we’ve really seen elevated levels of construction activity in Hawaii. I’m just sort of curious longer term if you feel like that that’s a potential volume catalyst in the couple of years.

Yes, so let me pretend I’m a politician and answer a question you didn’t – answer a question you didn’t ask. Okay. But I’ll eventually get to the…

Feel free, feel free.

--question, which is I continue to feel good about the overall state of the Hawaii economy long-term. I think it will continue to be a desirable tourist destination. I think that the military has made big investments there. I think given geo – sort of the geopolitical uncertainties and challenges, the Pacific will remain an area of focus into the future. And I think for those reasons, we will see relatively healthy, although mature, but still healthy levels of economic demand in Hawaii. So we feel long-term good about it. It – we also acknowledge that it’s a relatively mature market and will grow with the state’s GDP. I think there will be a subset to get to your question of capital spending, capital spending on renovations of hotels and new hotels, improvements in military spending, including a large drydock that is going to be built over the next few years in Pearl Harbor. So I think you’ll continue to see growth in spending in the Hawaii market over the next few years.

Okay. Matt, thanks for the time. Really appreciate it and I’ll hand it over.

Okay. Thanks, Jack.

[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from the line of Ben Nolan from Stifel. Ben, please go ahead. [Operator Instructions] The next question comes from the line of Jake Lacks of Wolfe Research. Jake, please go ahead.

Hey, thanks for the time.

Hi, Jake.

Hi, Jake.

So the premium versus spot rates was still above pre-pandemic levels in 1Q. Do you think there’s further pressure on your premium versus Shanghai Containerized Freight Index to come? Or do you think the premium’s at a structurally higher level now for some reason?

Yes. I would say that we are seeing higher for Matson’s two expedited service offerings. We’re seeing higher freight rates on the CLX, which is the only service that existed pre-pandemic. We’re seeing higher freight rates than we’ve seen pre-pandemic. And they’re – they remain at a sizable premium to the SCFI. We – and we’re seeing good level of demand for our expedited service offerings. And so I think that we’re going to see – I’m going to jump between commentary about Matson and then commentary about the Pacific, but I continue to believe in the Transpacific – entire Transpacific tradelane relatively good management of capacity as the demand begins to improve as we get into the second half of the year owing to see primarily seasonality factors. So I see the overall market being relatively orderly from a capacity management standpoint. And I think Matson continues to believe that we’re very well-positioned in the freight rates that we’re seeing now will continue to be very strong relative to the SCFI.

Got it. So I guess what I’m trying to understand is, do you think there’s more of a lag – your rates typically lag the Shanghai – SCFI a little bit? Do you think there’s more of a lag to come or…

Yes. I don’t – first of all, I don’t know Jake, but what I believe is that we’re getting priced off of airfreight, a discount to airfreight product. Our freight rates move somewhat independent of the SCFI now and are based on a savings relative to the airfreight equivalent prices. And so we’re not immune from the SCFI and the cycle, of course, we’re down with this cycle, but we’ve landed, or at least at the moment landed at a rate significantly higher than pre-pandemic and significantly higher than the rest of the market and then expect that to remain the case. So I don’t know if there’s a lag or not. I just think we’ve landed at a good spot. And it’s owing to our highly differentiated product.

Got it. Okay. And then China volumes in the core were a lot better than normal seasonality. Do you think this was share gains given the competitor leaving the market or broader demand improvement? And then can you just sort of give us a sense on how these trended through the quarter and into April?

Yes. I can say relative to the share question, I think we have taken share, but primarily from airfreight competitors because of our value proposition thereof moving at a fraction of the cost of airfreight. And so that’s where I think we’ve taken share and that’s our primary competitive space. And we were fortunate in that our customers are looking to manage inventories carefully as they work through their surplus. And that which will need to move from the regular ocean markets will need to move in an expedited fashion. But we – again I think if you look at our traditional customers who are airfreight managing down in an environment where they’re trying to reduce their transportation spend. I – so I think those are the big factors that we see driving our current pricing and positioning and demand, so.

Got it. And then just one clarification. You made comments about normal seasonality returning to the business. Is that only on the domestic tradelanes? Do you think that applies to China as well?

No, I think it applies to China as well. Yes.

All right. Great. Thanks for your time.

Okay, Jake. Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from the line of Ben Nolan of Stifel. Ben, please go ahead.

Okay. Can you guys hear me this time?

We can. Thanks.

Yes.

Good, good. Well, I’m like decades behind with respect to my technological acumen. The – I have a handful. Jack did a pretty good job of asking most of mine, but the one of the things I was thinking about and went back and looked at the fleet list is, you guys have on your CLX+ service, I think there’s six vessels that are committed to it to those one, I think maybe already did come off contract. The other is in a month or two. Is there any ability or room to maybe flex down that or maybe re-price some of that in such a way that it reduces some of your operating expenses given the softer international market?

Yes. So we are in – we are now into a five ship deployment. We can’t go further down and maintain a weekly service. So five becomes the 35-day rotation that gives us that, that weekly service into the Shanghai Ningbo markets that we need. So with regard to swapping out charters I – why don’t I let Joel talk about the charter durations and some of the other part of your question?

Yes. Yes, Ben, we’ve got, so right now, the five that are running the service today, one charter comes up here in June, and then three come up in 2025. And then the last, the fifth one comes up in early 2026. So it’s very unusual once you’ve committed to two or three years, whatever the underlying charter contract is to swap out of that. That could be expensive, and that would be an unusual thing to do. So the way we’re thinking about is we have one charter to reset here in the next couple months in the Q2, and then we’ll have – and then three more to do in 2025 and one to do in early 2026.

Okay. But it’s fair to think that the one that, I don’t know, I guess it depends on when you originally set it up, but is there any room for a cost reduction on the one comes up in July?

Yes, there is. I mean, we were in such a hot market, obviously wanted to maintain vessel capacity and the rates were up for the vessel charter periods of time similar to where freight rates were at that time. And so it was all about just procuring that capacity and not missing a sailing, which is why we took a sixth and seventh ship to make sure we didn’t miss sailings and have blank sailing. So all that was very profitable at that time. But today’s charter rates are below where we fixed the most charters before. So as each of these come up, there could be an opportunity to reduce some of the daily rate charter – the daily charter rates.

Okay.

Yes, this is Matt, Ben. The other point to make, which I think Joel made, but just to clarify, we do believe that in 2025, we will likely reset depending on what the market conditions are then. We’re paying a little bit more than market. When we look back the money we earned during that pandemic price, totally justified the pricing that we received on. But we’re in a new market now and we do think an opportunity in the future as we look forward to – reset of those charters at today’s rate would create a benefit to the company, but at that point in time.

Sure, sure. Well, I guess – while we’re talking about cost, you guys have always been pretty good at controlling costs, but in an environment where you don’t quite make as much money as you did and you’re not pressed to grow as fast. Are there other things – and we’re also seeing inflation that maybe brings cost more to the forefront here? Are there other areas where maybe you’re thinking about you can be a little bit more efficient?

Yes, I mean, I think the answer is, yes, there are. I think to your question or part of the question, we did not see a significant run up in our headcount or operations overhead as we flexed up during the pandemic. And so our increases in people costs or headcount and stuff was maybe 1%, 2%, 3%-ish per year during this. And we have plenty of people in these next few years of retirement age that we think we’re going to be able to manage our headcount costs. First of all, because they didn’t go up much. And second, because it’s just regular retirements. Of course, we’re now back into a somewhat normal environment where we have programs that have been in place for a while around looking at ways to become more efficient. And every year we identify hundreds of different projects in which we will look for ways to be smarter about the way we spend money and working with our key partners and vendors look for ways to reduce costs that will happen. That did not really happen during the pandemic years as our whole focus was on being able to carry the market, given the extraordinary level demand. So we’re getting back to sort of regular order. We will not be slow steaming, that’s not one of our models. And I think we’re not going to slow steam because in our Transpacific trades in particular, but all our trades in general, we earn a significant premium to the market, in part because we’re faster and more reliable, and that more than justifies the premium that we receive over the market, more than pays for higher additional operating costs. And having our own fleet of chassis and dedicated terminals and all of the other elements that allow us to be the go to carrier [indiscernible] that we think continue to be justified. But notwithstanding that and the ongoing inflationary cost pressures and those things we’re going to be after our regular order week in and week out of looking to be as efficient as we can.

Okay. And then last for me, you guys mentioned a couple times the prepared remarks, as you do – usually do, but looking for growth opportunities, and I think you specifically called out the Transpacific as part of that. I am curious if, again, in this market where maybe there’s a little bit less competition and whatnot. I mean, are you beginning to see a little bit more in the way of low-hanging fruit either organically or inorganically?

Yes, I’ll comment on it. I’d like Joel to comment as well. I think when we look back at – and we – that was part of the reason why we put our sort of chart on the progression of the Transpacific services. I think what we’ve been able to do over time is to prove to ourself that we can grow. Now if we’re at the bottom of the cycle, we’re hoping that some of the stresses that are being put on others create opportunities. I think we’re really well positioned to pull the trigger on acquisitions as they occur. We’ve also seen the ability over time to grow organically into adjacent markets. So we’re going to continue to look for ways in which to grow, whether that’s our seafood export business with the AAX and some of the services between China and New

Yes, I think that’s exactly right. And I think – Ben, I think you were also alluding a little bit to like the trends in the M&A market. Are we seeing more companies maybe that have to transact? And I think it’s almost the opposite. Things are really quiet right now in the M&A front, because there’s so much economic uncertainty. And there’s, of course, still the financial markets in many sectors are basically closed. So therefore, there’s less companies that are looking to transact on the sell side. Buyers are still waiting, but you just haven’t seen enough clarity for things to pick up yet. So there’s less actual activity out there right now. Because I think a lot of companies going into this period of time with decent balance sheets, it’s not like they have to do something, they can wait it out. So I don’t think there’s some wave of deals coming our way to fit our profile, Ben. And our approach in general is just to maintain discipline and be steady and be focused. So I’m not sure big wave of new deals would matter to us anyway, but we’re not seeing one come anytime soon.

Yes, I appreciate that. And I know, I think I said that the last one was the last one, but I had one other that came to mind. It appears as though there’s some pretty good progress being made on the West Coast with respect to labor, but it doesn’t seem like it’s quite resolved yet. It know in the past that had been something of a tailwind for you guys. Are you seeing any impact at all from people looking for a little security with the Matson business versus everybody else?

I don’t think we’ve seen it. I don’t think we, that’s been really a factor in our demand levels. I mean, in talking with our customers, I don’t think we’ve come across anyone who said, hey, we’re going to – we’re shifting our freight to you, because you could do things other people can’t do as it relates to a potential labor disruption, which we hope does not occur. As you’ve read – I’ve read in the trade press that – steady progress is being made and we would direct any inquiry to the PMA, the Pacific Maritime Association. Yes, we’re a member, but we’ve all agreed to just let the PMA do the updating on behalf of all the ship owners. So but yeah, so far we haven’t seen that as much a factor at all.

Okay. All right. I appreciate it. Thanks guys.

Okay. Thanks, Ben.

Thanks, Ben.

[Operator Instructions] At this time, I would like to turn it back to the speaker for any further comments, Matt Cox?

Okay. Thanks, operator. Hey, thanks to everyone for participating today. We look forward to catching up with everyone next quarter. Thank you.