Thank you, Thomas. Following-up on the financial highlights Thomas just provided, Slide 5 shows a summary of second quarter results for the Airlaid Materials segment. Revenues were down 14% on a constant currency basis versus the same period last year, driven primarily by lower selling prices of approximately $13 million and 4% lower shipments. Selling prices were lower mainly due to cost pass-throughs, reflecting declines in raw materials and energy costs in Europe and selective price concessions to non-floating customers to regain volume. On a net basis, the price cost gap was favorable to earnings by $1.2 million. Volume was lower year-over-year, primarily due to weaker shipments in Hygiene and Wipes categories. The decline in Hygiene was largely driven by pricing actions taken in 2023 to protect margins and improve our price cost dynamic. Conversely, the decline in Wipes category was related to timing of customer orders, and we expect higher wipes volume in the third quarter. Operations were unfavorable by $2.2 million versus the prior year, primarily due to lower production of approximately 3,800 tons to manage inventory levels. Foreign exchange and related currency hedging negatively impacted earnings by $500,000, mainly due to the weaker euro. And EBITDA margins for the segment improved by 20 basis points versus the prior year quarter. Slide 6, shows a summary of second quarter results for the Composite Fibers segment. Total revenues were down 6% on a constant currency basis, mainly due to lower selling prices of $7.5 million from floating contracts implemented with larger food and beverage customers and targeted pricing actions to preserve volume. Shipments were higher in all categories except Wallcover when compared to the same period last year. Overall, the price cost gap for Composite Fibers remained favorable with prices declining by $7.5 million versus lower prices for key raw materials, energy and freight, which improved earnings by $8.4 million versus the same quarter last year. Operations and other was favorable by $1.7 million, mainly due to higher inclined wire production. Foreign exchange was slightly favorable by $100,000, and EBITDA margins for the segment improved by 450 basis points versus the prior year quarter. Slide 7, shows a summary of second quarter results for the Spunlace segment. Revenues were up 4% on a constant currency basis, driven by higher shipments of 5%, mainly in the Critical Cleaning and Hygiene categories. This was partially offset by lower selling prices of approximately $2 million coming from raw material cost pass-through provisions, primarily in the Hygiene and Wipes categories. Raw material, energy and other inflation were favorable by $4.1 million, resulting in positive price cost gap. Operations were $1.1 million favorable, mainly driven by higher production. Foreign exchange negatively impacted earnings by $400,000, coming from the weaker euro. And EBITDA margins for the segment improved by 410 basis points versus the prior year quarter. Slide 8, shows corporate costs and other financial items. Corporate costs were approximately $1.9 million lower versus the second quarter of last year. This was primarily driven by loss recovery related to a fiber vendor for faulty material supply to Glatfelter in 2022. Strategic initiatives costs were again higher this quarter, driven by our proposed transaction with Berry's HHNF business, which we are expecting to close in the second half of this year. Slide 9, shows our cash flow summary. For the second quarter of 2024, our adjusted free cash flow was approximately $43 million higher versus the same period in 2023. This was largely driven by higher earnings of approximately $8 million and lower working capital usage of approximately $40 million, primarily from accounts payable. Capital expenditures were lower by $2 million, while other operating items lowered cash flow by approximately $7 million, largely driven by fewer vendor rebates this quarter compared to the same quarter last year. Slide 10, shows some balance sheet and liquidity metrics. Our leverage ratio, as calculated under the bank credit agreement was 3.5x as of June 30, and we had available liquidity of approximately $112 million at the end of Q2. This concludes my prepared remarks. I will now turn the call back to Thomas.