Thank you, H, and good morning to everyone joining us on the call. As reported in our release earlier today Insteel's net earnings for the third quarter of fiscal 2023 fell to $10.6 million or $0.54 a share from $38.6 million or $1.96 per diluted share a year ago. As has been the case through the first two quarters of the year, we were once again faced with a difficult challenge of comparing the current period results against the record financial performance of 2022. Our results continue to be unfavorably impacted by the narrowing in spreads between selling prices and raw material costs combined with higher unit conversion costs and lower shipments. However, we have seen some positive developments. As we progress through the third quarter, spread has improved and widened sequentially from the loans we experienced during the second quarter as we began to benefit from the consumption of lower cost inventory. Additionally, we have benefited from the seasonal turn in shipping volume that typically occurs during the third quarter as the weather related headwinds subside. Nonetheless, we still fell short of our internal shipment forecast and competitive pricing pressures and fall in steel scrap values have continued to erode our average selling prices. We reported net sales for the quarter of $165.7 million, reflecting a 27.1% decline from the prior year. Shipments fell 3.2% year-over-year but rose 11.3% sequentially from Q2. Despite the seasonal upturn in construction activity during the quarter, we did not experience the expected boost in shipments following the cycle of customer destocking that has suppressed demand in the first half of the year. Average selling prices fell 24.7% from a year ago. Sequentially ASPs declined for the fourth straight quarter falling 6.4% from Q2. Competitive pricing pressures and the drop-off of steel scrap prices continue to negatively impact our ASPs with the more severe drops for products most exposed to the residential construction markets. As conveyed during our second quarter call, price increases were implemented across most of our product lines in April following four straight months of scrap price increases. However, scrap values dropped in May and June by combined $95, once again providing downward pressure on ASPs. Gross profit for the quarter fell $37.7 million from a year ago, and gross margin narrowed to 12.3% from 25.6% due to a combination of lower spreads, the reduction in shipments and higher overall unit conversion costs resulting from lower production levels. On a sequential basis, gross profit increased $7.1 million from the second quarter, and gross margin expanded 400 basis points. Gross profit for the quarter benefited from widening spreads, as a reduction in raw material costs exceeded the decrease in average selling prices, and gross margins improved each month within the quarter rising to a high point in June. As we head into our fourth fiscal quarter, we anticipate the positive trend to continue as lower cost inventories consumed assuming that average selling prices for our products remained flat or declined to a lesser extent. Unit conversion costs for Q3 improved sequentially from the second quarter, but were higher than the prior year as a result of lower than expected operating volumes. As we move into our fourth quarter, we expect to make further progress in reducing our conversion cost assuming that operating volumes increased to anticipated levels. SG&A expense for the quarter decreased $7.9 million, or 4.8% of net sales from $8.2 million, or 3.6% of net sales last year. The dollar decrease primarily resulted from a relative year-over-year change in the cash surrender value of life insurance policies, partially offset by higher compensation expense. Our effective tax rate for the quarter was 22% down slightly from 22.7% last year. Looking ahead to the balance of the year, we expect our effective rate will remain steady at around 22% subject to the level of pre-tax earnings, book tax differences and the other assumptions and estimates that compose our tax provision calculation. Moving to the cash flow statement the balance sheet. Cash flow from operations for the quarter generated $23.8 million of cash due to a working capital reduction that was driven mainly by a $6.7 million increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses, and a $3.4 million reduction in inventories. Our inventory position at the end of the quarter represented 3.2 months of shipments on a forward-looking basis calculated off of forecasted Q4 shipments compared with 3.1 months at the end of the second quarter. Additionally, our inventories at the end of the third quarter were valued at an average unit cost that was lower than our third quarter cost of sales, which should favorably impact margins during the fourth quarter as the lower cost materials consumed and reflected in cost of sales provided at ASCs and fall to a greater extent. We incurred $11.2 million in capital expenditures in the quarter for a total of $26.6 million through the first nine months of our fiscal year. Based on our forecasted expenditures for the fourth quarter, we have raised our full year target to $35 million from the previous communicated target of $30 million. H will provide more detail on this topic in his remarks. From a liquidity perspective, we ended the quarter with $91.7 million of cash on hand, and we're debt-free with no borrowings outstanding on our $100 million revolving credit facility. Finally, during the third quarter, we continued our share buyback program repurchasing $403,000 of per common equity equals approximately 14,000 shares. Going forward, our capital deployment strategy will remain focused on three objectives: one, reinvesting in the business for growth and to improve our cost of productivity; two, maintaining the appropriate financial strength and flexibility; and three, returning capital to shareholders in a disciplined manner. As we move into the fourth quarter the outlook for our construction end markets remain mostly positive. The most recent reports for the Architectural Billings and Dodge Momentum Indexes leading indicators for non-residential building construction reflects softening activity levels, but relatively stable conditions that are expected to continue for the near-term. In June the ABI remained mostly steady at score of 50.1, which marked the first time since last fall that the score has stayed above the growth threshold of 50 for two consecutive months. The Dodge Momentum Index which tracks non-residential building projects going into planning declined 2.5% in June down to 197.3. However, year-over-year the index is still 25% higher. The drop in the June reading resulted from a decline in institutional component which fell 10.5%, while the commercial component rose 3.1%. However in the June 4th, Dodge noted that the continued growth in the commercial segment may be impacted in the second half of the year by the higher interest rate environment and tighter lending standards. The monthly constructive spending data continues to remain strong with the latest May report showing total constructing spending on a seasonally-adjusted annual basis up 2.4% from last year with non-residential construction up over 17% and public highway and street construction one of the largest end-use applications for our products up 14%. Finally, this week the AIA released the semiannual construction forecast for non-residential building construction for 2023 and 2024 reflecting continued strong growth for the current year. Spending on nonresidential building is projected to increase 19.7% for 2023 driven by strong gains in the industrial sector. However the forecast also indicates that spending growth is expected to cool in 2024 with only a 2% increase in overall spend projected. This concludes my prepared remarks. I will now turn the call back over to H.