Thanks, Andrew. Economic data were resilient during the first quarter of 2025, driven by strong consumer spending and steady employment growth. However, risk markets came under mounting pressure as sentiment weakened amid escalating trade tensions, rising inflation and signs slowing. Treasury yields declined as markets priced in as many as three Fed rate cuts for 2025. Following a strong start to the year in January, loan performance weakened in February and March as sentiment soured due to tariff concerns, capital markets volatility and weakening consumer confidence. Rising uncertainty combined with the sharp equity market selloff dampened loan demand and pushed spreads higher. Loan returns were negative in March, declining 31 basis points, marking the worst monthly performance in September '22. Despite the March pullback, loans delivered a positive return of 48 basis points for the quarter. High yield bond spreads widened materially during quarter end driven by lingering uncertainty around tariffs and their impact on business and consumer sentiment. High yield bonds declined 1.07% in the first quarter, but remained positive year-to-date returning 94 basis points as of March. Private assets were generally insulated, but not entirely immune from the volatility experienced in the public markets in the first quarter. Private credit volume totaled $64 billion in the first quarter, down 7% from the prior quarter, but up 12% year-over-year. As of March 31st, the average spread on private core middle market loans with SOFR plus 525, a 162 basis points above B-rated syndicated loans and 182 basis points above high yield bonds. Additionally, just 10% of syndicated loans issued in the first quarter included a financial covenant compared to 76% of upper middle market private deals and 96% of lower middle market private deals. Turning to our investment activity. As discussed on our call last quarter, we maintained a cautious view entering the year given the potential for volatility stemming from geopolitical conflicts, fiscal and trade policy, among other factors. Even as many market strategies forecast the benign market environment for 2025, we conducted a thorough position by position evaluation of the portfolio to assess the potential near and medium impact of tariffs and the uncertain path of economic rate and have been in close contact with sponsors and management teams. As a result, we believe we have a solid understanding of the portfolio's first order exposure to tariffs. However, we remain cautious as second and third order effects are still uncertain and may take time to materialize depending on how the tariff situation evolves. Despite the sluggish M&A environment, we saw strong origination activity supported by an expansive sourcing network. Our broad base of incumbent borrowers across our platform also remains a consistent source of repeat opportunities. As Andrew mentioned, we believe private credit offers greater relative value compared to the public markets. Approximately 96% of new investment activity was in privately originating investments, a 100% of which were first lien senior secured loans. The average GAAP yield of new portfolio credit investments was 11.9%. We went to lower and core middle market companies with average earnings of approximately $25 million to $75 million of EBITDA, which we believe is a competitive sweet spot. They are generally diversified businesses that are often overlooked by large credit managers due to their size while their balance sheets may not meet the standardized criteria for traditional lenders like banks. As a result, we typically have greater ability to negotiate favorable terms and structure investments that help mitigate downside risks. These businesses are typically more domestically focused compared to larger upper middle market firms, making them less vulnerable to global supply chain disruptions and shifts in trade policy. We invest in both sponsored and non-sponsored VAT transactions. Within sponsored leading we do not compete against the large direct lending funds and instead lend to small or emerging sponsors where there is typically less competition and greater potential to capture a yield premium. Non-sponsored lending opportunities comprise a wide range of borrowers that in most cases have never accepted outside capital. This includes multigenerational, family owned businesses, sole proprietors or other tightly held businesses and the like. We favor these types of investments because there is often a strong ability to control deal terms and create highly structured investments to protect our downside. Sales, exits and repayments of $288 million exceeding purchases of $163 million in the quarter when excluding portfolio hedges. We selectively exited in public credit positions where we identified elevated risk given the geopolitical backdrop. As of March 31st, private credit investments represented 72% of the portfolio compared to 65% as of the end of last year. Approximately 84% of the portfolio consists of senior secured debt as of March 31st, unchanged from the previous quarter. The Fund's allocation to unsecured debt declined to just 3% as of the end of the quarter compared to 5% as of the end of last year. Asset-based finance represents 3% of the portfolio as of the end of the quarter, unchanged from the previous quarter, while equity and other investments represented 10% compared to 8% as of the end of last year. Turning to the liability side of our balance sheet, we believe our cost structure gives us a competitive edge with 58% of drawn leverage as of March 31st, comprised of preferred shares, which provide favorable regulatory treatment versus traditional term or revolving debt facilities and flexibility in the types of assets we can borrow against. I'll now turn it back to Andrew to discuss our forward outlook.