Thank you, Neal. Good morning, everyone. I'm going to start by discussing the rationale for our new reporting segments, the Drilling and Completion segment and the Artificial Lift and Downhole segment. This structure mirrors our internal management and reporting structure and it better aligns reporting segments with the markets, activity drivers and customers we serve. For example, the Drilling and Completions segment focuses on oilfield services customers, while the Artificial Lift and Downhole segment serves E&P operators and other end users. We will continue to report revenue in our historical 7 product lines with revenues with Variperm's financial results included in the Downhole product line. We have a broad product and solutions offering, which can make understanding FET a challenge for new investors. The new reporting segments simplify FET's investment story. We have provided supplemental schedules in the earnings release showing 2023 quarterly results in the new reporting format. After the filing of this quarter's Form 10-Q, we will issue an 8-K that includes recast historical financial information. Let me share some additional information regarding our new segments and their first quarter results. The Drilling and Completions segment is comprised of the drilling, subsea coiled tubing and stimulation and intervention product lines. The customer base within this segment includes many of the world's largest oilfield service companies, primarily in the drilling, hydraulic fracturing, well intervention and deepwater installation and service markets. We supply mission-critical consumable products and capital equipment to these companies, allowing them to improve efficiency, reduce well costs and increase the safety of their operations. The majority of the capital equipment provided by FET falls within the Drilling and Completion segment and represents roughly one-third of segment revenue. Industry activity measured by global rig count or U.S. frac spread count drives this segment. Although rig count has declined over the last decade, the quality and capability of rigs has greatly improved. For example, over the last 10 years in the U.S., the average footage drilled per rig is up 2x to 3x. On the frac side, quality and capability of hydraulic fracturing fleets follows a similar trend. Wells have gotten longer with more stages and more [ proppant ] than in recent years. However, the number of frac fleets operating has not increased. Wells completed per fleet is up almost 60% over the last 10 years. The gains will not stop here. Operators demand greater capabilities and efficiencies, and these gains are only possible because our customers have invested in the products that FET provides. In the first quarter, the Drilling and Completions segment revenue decreased 6%, primarily related to two ROV projects that were completed last quarter, lower demand for drilling capital equipment and lower international coiled tubing sales. During the quarter, we saw an increase in demand in our stimulation and intervention product line. Our customers were catching up on the pullback witnessed in the second half of the year. In fact, we set a new quarterly revenue record for our greaseless wireline cables. Favorable product mix drove segment EBITDA growth of 13%, resulting in EBITDA margins improving 190 basis points to 12%. Orders were $117 million, up $3 million with a book-to-bill ratio of 98%. The Artificial Lift and Downhole segment includes the Downhole Production Equipment and Valve Solutions product lines, combining Variperm's premium Downhole Solutions with our Davis-Lynch casing hardware and our Multilift Artificial Lift Solutions enhances FET's existing Artificial Lift portfolio, and it facilitates revenue synergies from sales pull-through both in Canada and around the globe. The Artificial Lift and Downhole segment customers primarily include E&P operators and other end users who own or process oil and natural gas from production at the well site to downstream processing and refining. This segment's revenue were primarily driven by well count, well complexity and well production. Compared to a decade ago, the average wells in the U.S. -- the average wells per rig in the U.S. is up almost 40%, and those wells are on average almost twice as long and produce 3x as much oil per well. This is possible by our customers' strategic investment in products and technologies that FET provides, both in the well and on the surface. Earlier, Neal discussed the transformational impact Variperm had on FET's financial results. This is also evident in the Artificial Lift and Downhole segment's sequential improvement, with revenue growth of 42%, EBITDA expansion of 107% and margin improvement of 680 basis points to 22%. In addition to the impact of Variperm, Artificial Lift and Casing Equipment sales increased, while revenue from Processing Equipment and Valves declined. Favorable product mix boosted EBITDA improvements in the quarter. Orders were $88 million, an 89% increase driven by contributions from Variperm. The segment book-to-bill of 105% was above 1 as we secured long lead time orders for production equipment. Our consolidated first quarter results were down the guidance fairway in terms of revenue and EBITDA. For the second quarter, we expect revenue and EBITDA growth in the U.S. and international markets where budgets have been approved and customers are executing on their spending plans. However, these increases may be offset by the second quarter Canadian breakup. Depending on the weather, this seasonal impact typically causes Canadian rig count activity to decrease by around 50% from the first to second quarter. With a larger portion of our revenue now derived from Canada, breakup could have a more significant impact on our results than in previous years. We anticipate second quarter revenue in the range of $200 million to $220 million and EBITDA in the range of $24 million to $28 million. Here are a few details for modeling purposes for the second quarter. We anticipate corporate costs of $7 million, interest expense to be $8 million and depreciation and amortization expense of roughly $13 million. Let me turn our attention to free cash flow results. We are pleased with our first quarter free cash flow of $2 million exceeded our expectation and guidance. Putting this in context, in each of the past two years, our first quarter free cash flow was roughly negative $25 million as we made beginning of the year payments for property taxes and annual incentives and as we build working capital to fuel full year growth plans. The improvement this year came from two sources: the Variperm acquisition and net working capital management. The Variperm acquisition was especially attractive because of their ability to convert EBITDA to free cash flow. Variperm did that in the first quarter, generating cash flow in line with our expectation and their historical trend. We expect this performance to continue through the year. Net working capital pro forma for the Variperm acquisition was roughly flat quarter-on-quarter in contrast to the builds in net working capital we experienced in the prior two years. Our teams managed inbound material receipts and lowered inventory levels while meeting customer demand. We have the ability to drive inventory lower and will push for increased inventory turns through the year. As a reminder, our free cash flow -- I'm sorry, our full year free cash flow guidance assumed our EBITDA of $100 million to $120 million, less cash taxes and interest of $45 million; CapEx of $10 million and approximately $7 million for other payments, primarily related to the Variperm acquisition. We did not assume any reduction in net working capital for the year. Therefore, our solid first quarter performance and second quarter outlook increases our confidence in achieving our full year free cash flow guidance of $40 million to $60 million. And for the second quarter, we expect free cash flow to be positive, in line with our full year guidance. We have fielded investor questions about our plans to address our 2025 notes and for returning cash to shareholders. Our base case plan for both has not changed since the announcement of the Variperm acquisition last November. Let me review the specifics of our plan, starting with liquidity. We ended the first quarter with $49 million of cash on hand and $72 million of availability under our revolving credit facility with total liquidity of $121 million. Between our current liquidity and guided 2024 free cash flow, we expect to retire the remaining $134 million of our 9% senior secured notes by the end of the year. These notes mature in August of 2025 and are callable at no premium beginning in August of this year. In a similar fashion, we expect to utilize 2025 free cash flow to pay off the seller note around the middle of 2025. This seller note matures at the end of 2026 and is callable at any time without premium or penalty. In summary, in five to six quarters, we expect to have retired all of our long-term debt with net leverage of around 1x trailing EBITDA. With this low leverage and flexible capital structure, we would be in a position to return a portion of our free cash flow to shareholders through share repurchases or dividends. As an example, of a dividend or repurchase using 50% of our 2024 free cash flow could be $20 million, $30 million or around a 10% yield at current market prices. And this would still leave considerable free cash flow for net debt reduction, other strategic growth investments or incremental distributions. We have explored options to refinance our long-term debt and enhance flexibility for a more rapid return of cash to shareholders. To-date, we have not found an option that meets our expectations or requirements. We will continue to evaluate options that could accelerate the timing and size of potential distributions while we execute our base case plan. Let me turn the call back to Neal for closing remarks. Neal?