Thanks, Travis, and good morning, everyone. I would like to begin by echoing Travis' comments. We're excited about carrying our strategy forward with the new members of our management team. The executive transition has been smooth. We've made several pragmatic changes to our operating model that will accelerate our progress. We successfully navigated a difficult industry-wide challenge and the company is energized. Today, I will walk through the financial results for the first quarter of 2024. I'll then turn to our outlook for Q2, and I'll close with a review of our balance sheet and update on our capital allocation activities. As shown on Page 4 of the supplemental deck, first quarter revenue was $234.5 million, a decrease of 0.9% from Q1 '23 and a decrease of 3.9% sequentially. Our revenues fell just shy of the low end of our guidance range for the quarter despite the disruption to our claims volumes caused by the clearinghouse cyber outage that Travis mentioned previously. While it's difficult to quantify precisely, we estimate this disruption impacted our first quarter revenues by roughly $5 million to $6 million. And excluding this impact, our revenues would have been within our guidance range for the quarter. Turning to revenues by service line, as shown on Page 5 of the supplemental deck. Relative to Q4 '23, network-based revenues declined 11.6% sequentially or $6 million driven largely by the impact of the aforementioned claims volume disruption to our complementary network, fee-for-service and property casualty businesses. Also impacting the service line were a nonrecurring customer credit and some client attrition. Our analytics-based revenues fell 2.1% sequentially, largely due to the claims volume disruption. Our Payment and Revenue Integrity revenues declined 0.6% sequentially also reflecting the impact of the clearinghouse outage on claims volumes for our prepaid solutions, offset by strength in our Discovery Health postpay solutions. Versus the prior year quarter, network-based revenues declined 19.3%; analytics-based revenues grew 5.0%; and Payment and Revenue Integrity revenues grew 4.8%. Excluding a $3.8 million contribution to revenues from BST, which is reported in our analytics-based revenues, first quarter consolidated revenues were $230.7 million, down 3.9% sequentially and down 2.4% from the prior year quarter. Our first quarter results reflected volatility in claims volumes with the clearinghouse cyber outage impacting our claims flows, particularly in March, given our typical claim lag relative to dates of medical service. As shown on Page 7 of the supplemental deck, total first quarter bill charges decreased 4% sequentially to $41.5 billion and identified potential savings decreased 3% sequentially to $5.7 billion. In our core commercial health plan segment, bill charges decreased 6% sequentially to $18.3 billion, and identified potential savings decreased 3% sequentially to $5.4 billion. The sequential decreases were more acute in physicians claims compared to facilities-based claims. We believe the larger hospital systems were able to quickly switch to alternative clearinghouses or find other workarounds to route claims to payers. Although the clearinghouse outage continued to affect our April volumes, and we haven't digested the full impact given our claims lag, we continue to believe this is largely a timing issue as our cost containment solutions are still required for claims coming through the payers. In terms of the utilization environment, we note the relatively strong first quarter facility volume data reported by the public [indiscernible] operators who were able to work around the clearinghouse disruption by the end of the first quarter. The largely exogenous weakness in our volumes was exacerbated by a decline in revenues as a percentage of identified savings on what we call revenue yield. As shown on Page 8 of the supplemental deck, our revenue yield declined about 4 basis points sequentially for the overall business, which includes PSAV and PEPM. In our core percentage of savings revenue model, which is approximately 90% of our revenues, our revenue yield fell about 10 basis points in the quarter, which had an impact of about $4.4 million to our revenues. That included about 5 basis points of decline from idiosyncratic yield shifts, most of which are temporary and likely to abate and about 5 basis points of decline from a customer credit that we expect to run off in Q2. Importantly, none of the decline in our PSAV revenue yield was related to any contract changes with our customers. Turning to expenses. First quarter adjusted EBITDA expenses were $87.7 million, increasing $7.4 million from the prior year quarter, but up only $0.4 million sequentially. The increase of $7.4 million over Q1 '23 was driven by the combination of the acquisition of BST, structural cost increases and investments in the business year-over-year. For the sequential comparison, the modest increase in adjusted EBITDA expenses reflected tight expense controls as we held the line on expenses amid the external pressures on our revenue. Adjusted EBITDA was $146.8 million in Q1 '24, down 6.1% from $156.3 million in the prior year quarter and down 6.4% from $156.8 million in Q4 '23. Our Q1 adjusted EBITDA was 2% below the lower end of our guidance due to the external pressures on our revenue. Adjusted EBITDA margin declined to 62.6% in Q1 '24, down 180 basis points from 64.2% in the prior quarter and down from 66% from the prior year quarter. Our first quarter margin was driven largely by the combination of lower revenues against our largely fixed expense base. As the volume environment normalizes, we expect our margins to track back to a 63% to 64% range, in line with our prior commentary. Turning to our second quarter guidance as outlined on Page 11 of the supplemental deck, we anticipate revenues of $235 million to $250 million and adjusted EBITDA of $145 million to $160 million. Our second quarter projections reflect slightly lower visibility related to the ongoing and uncertain impact of the clearinghouse outage on our claims volumes. Our view is that the claims volume disruption is largely a timing issue and we began to see signs of that our volumes were normalizing in the back half of April. So despite the shortfall in our Q1 results and our lower visibility for Q2, our expectation is that revenue growth will accelerate in the second half, and we are maintaining our guidance for fiscal year 2024. As you're aware from our press release, based on the recent performance of our stock price, we conducted an impairment test in the first quarter of 2024, which incorporates current financial market conditions, including our share price, market discount rates and other factors. Based on this test, the estimated fair values of our goodwill and indefinite-lived assets were less than their carrying values. As a result, we recorded noncash impairment charges of $516.4 million for our goodwill and $2.7 million for our intangibles and recognized the charge in our GAAP earnings results. To clarify, the impairment charge was not driven by changes in our outlook for the business or our cash flow projections, but instead by our stock price and implied cost of capital. Turning to the balance sheet and capital allocation. Our operating cash flow was $49.7 million in the first quarter and levered free cash flow was $19.2 million. As a reminder, the first and third quarters are typically our higher quarters for cash flow given the timing of our interest and tax payments. As shown on Page 14 of the supplemental deck, we ended the quarter with $59 million of unrestricted cash. Net of cash, our total and operating leverage ratios were 7.4x and 5.4x, respectively. We continue to be disciplined in allocating our capital with a near-term focus on debt reduction. As shown on Page 12 of the supplemental deck, during the first quarter, we used $18.2 million of our cash to repurchase or repay $24.4 million face value of our debt, including $21.1 million face value of our 6% senior convertible PIK Notes. We also allocated $10.5 million of our cash towards the repurchase of 11 million shares in the quarter. Our long-term capital priorities remain the same. Our highest priority remains investing in the business to drive growth and long-term value. You should expect us to continue making a series of small but critical organic investments to support our platform, including our new core products and our Data & Decision Science service line. With our remaining cash flow, we will primarily focus on debt reduction. While our long-term priorities have not changed, following the acquisition of BST, in the near term, we will emphasize organic investments and debt reduction and deemphasize M&A. Finally, as I mentioned, we spent $10.5 million on share repurchases in the first quarter. Additional share repurchases will not be a priority for the remainder of the year as we will focus on debt retirement. Before I end, I want to reinforce Travis' comments regarding the value of MultiPlan provides to the entire health care ecosystem. We serve a critical role as a long-standing data-enabled intermediary between providers, payers, employers and consumers. We provide widely accepted services that reduce health care costs, including for patients, and make health care transactions more efficient, transparent and fair for all parties involved, including 1.4 million providers, over 700 payers, over 100,000 employer plan sponsors and tens of millions of consumers. In 2023, we identified $23 billion in potential medical cost savings across all of our products, and we reduced out-of-pocket costs and reduced or eliminated millions of balanced bills. Consider a few facts. In 2023, we priced $15.4 million out-of-network claims through our platform, $15.4 million. This service solves a significant problem for all parties involved because there is no contracted price between providers and payers for out-of-network services. And there is often a wide gap between the provider's list price and what employers are willing to pay for out-of-network services under their benefit plan designs. Our platform sits between these parties and serves a valuable role in helping to determine a fair price, which, in the case of MultiPlan and our services, is accepted without appeal by providers 98% of the time. That's 98%. Further, it is widely known and transparent throughout the industry that out-of-network reimbursements are consistently priced at a premium to contracted in-network rates for the same service even after cost containment tools like ours are applied. By the way, our average revenue per claim across our out-of-network pricing services in 2023, $44 per claim. That's $44. Further, our services insulate millions of health care patients from balanced bills annually. In 2023, MultiPlan priced over 15 million out-of-network claims that were accepted without appeal or dispute, including over 10.5 million claims for which we contractually eliminated balance bills for patients through our provider network, negotiation and surprise bill services. Nearly everyone agrees that the No Surprises Act was good for consumers. And in 2023, the number of balance bills we eliminated was approximately equivalent to the number eliminated by the No Surprises Act according to a recent survey conducted by AHIP and the Blues Association. And importantly, we didn't just start eliminating balance bills on behalf of consumers in 2022, when the No Surprises Act went into effect, we have been solving this problem for decades. That brings me to the end of my comments. I'll turn the call back over to Travis.