Okay. Thanks, Stacey. So tough act to follow is the marketing and the ads. All right. Yes. So, I'm here to talk to you a little bit about how we think about innovation and how we've kind of transformed innovation. And just a quick thing about myself, we haven't been in these forums. But so, I've been doing R&D innovation for now close to 40 years. Big company, about 20 years, Procter, J&J, and then led some smaller midsize companies, in in both beauty and home. So, I came to Church & Dwight about seven and a half years ago, attracted by the brands, the culture, and really kind of an invitation to innovate differently. So, my kind of key messages today as I go through this is we have transformed how we innovate at Church & Dwight. I'll show you some of that, and it's also a unique approach that we've developed for Church & Dwight. So, it is not a smaller version of what you may hear from some of our bigger competitors. It is unique, and that's why we think it's sustainable. So, let me first talk about, what are we doing to create differently. So, Rick mentioned this before. We've gone from one innovation source in a sense to five. And not only are they additive, really the use the challenge here is how do you make them complementary and not competing? And I think that's part of what we do differently at Church & Dwight. So, let me kind of give you a couple of different levels of why this complementary connection is very different for us. So, when I joined the company, you kind of look at our portfolio and it continues to grow a lot of brands, a lot of diverse brands, a lot of diverse categories, and yet we're very proud of our revenue per employee. So, that's a challenge when you look across the organization. So over time, we've looked at it and the highs, how do you flip that model into an advantage into a strength. So, our advantage today is we really want to connect a lot of these diverse dots, which are really least innovation, better than others do and probably in ways that others can't because we know personally, I know what the big companies can and can't do, and they really can't break the silos the way that we can because of our size and our culture. So, let me give you a kind of a very concrete example. Last year, we introduced BATISTE Sweat Activated, and how do we get there? So, if you go across our or across our, brands and our categories, odor control, odor reduction is a common consumer need, right? Whether it be oral care, laundry, litter, women's health, deodorants, you name it. That's a very common need. So, rather than attack that individually by R&D department in a sense, we create these platform teams that go across and try to create scale. So, the idea is, hey, if you're looking at odor, talk to each other across the organization and connect those dots better than others. And when we go talk to the outside world and our partners, we go to them as a company, not as an individual business unit. So the BATISTE story is one of our partners identified some things, some technologies that were really existing in other categories, and we were the first to bring them over into hair care. Others could have, but they never did because they're not really talking to each other, Right? They’re very vertical in how they do it. So, that's kind of a bit of our magic with connecting these diverse competencies. And if you kind of elevate that to these five innovation sources, it's kind of the same story. Other people could do this, but in most companies, they've got one kind of dominant work stream for innovation. We've got these and they're not really competing. They're really complementary. So today, kind of end result is more than 50% of our pipeline is coming from these new innovation sources. So, not only are we adding in terms of the contribution, but the total pipeline is actually now much better than it ever was before. So, kind of, once you have a great robust pipeline in a sense, now it's about making choices. So, this is our other unique way of looking at our innovation across our categories, which is this very simple grid around science-based innovation versus business growth. But this is really driving our behavior when we have a good strong portfolio. It’s how do you make them bigger, kind of the arrows here? So whether it be choosing where do we make the marketing investments, where do we leverage these across different channels, or where do we leverage these across international. It's all about creating the scale once you find something that you really, really like. When you step back, today, our innovation portfolio is more balanced than it's ever been before across all the types of innovation. We have more transformational innovations, which are what we call our blue box. It's the upper right hand side. Stacey mentioned a few of those. We're very proud of all of those that are there. Shoots in particular, I've never seen a product where from early development all the way to launch, the consumers love them all the way through. We've never had a negative reaction to that product. It's really intuitive and loved. And we have got more coming. Unfortunately, we're here in the beginning of the year. There's some things that we'll reveal later on in the year because it's too soon, but we've got a very strong pipeline coming. The last thing is we got bigger bets, and we that's just kind of the top of this of this grid here. We got a lot of products. Stacey's mentioned a few of these. I'm not gonna go through, the list, and then Mike is going to talk a couple of these in the international portfolio too. Okay. And let's just talk results. So basically, if you look at all these together, we have now increased and accelerated our incremental net sales from historically, it was 1% to 1.5% to 1.5% to 2%. Our metric for innovation is in INS, right, incremental net sales. So it is not other people measure it differently. This is not gross sales. This is post cannibalization, so we're not just looking at replacing our products. Every time we're looking at innovation, we're looking at how does it grow and how does it add to the company's growth. That's why, as Rick and Matt mentioned, last year, we were contributing half of the growth. It was pure incremental growth from innovation. If you step back and say, okay. When we kind of started this in 2017 or so versus today, given the size of the company, that change from 1% to 1.5% to 2% is really almost a 4x in incremental dollars every year, because the company's grown, so the challenge becomes bigger every year. As we drive that, we're looking at 4x what it was seven years ago. So and it's also -- it's working, but it's also sustainable. We think 2024 was our best ever. 2025 is continued momentum. You said, you've heard a couple of these, but we truly believe that the model, because of the way it's working for us, we think is going to continue to contribute long-term. And then one last piece to cover before I hand it over to Mike, kind of our global footprint. We've got seven global centers, four of which are outside of the U.S. And each of them have very clear responsibilities. We have no overlap. We're too lean to have overlap with within our categories. You see the big flags there are our seven global centers. And then we also have six regional sites, which are kind of the smaller ones. And this is really more about putting the basic, whether it be technical folks or regulatory folks to help Mike and his team grow across around the world. The next thing, kind of back to that connect the story, all of these folks now, if you look at typical R&D products, package and development and so forth, regulatory people feeding the global structure, our plants quality people, and our innovation folks from marketing, they're all under one roof. They're one R&D organization. So that's why for us that that power of that that connected team, again, it's another thing that probably the big guys can't do. They're much more vertical. The smaller guys don't have that luxury either. So it's another one of the advantages. Everybody's now marching towards, a really humming innovation engine to be honest. So as we look at this we feel, we've transformed R&D and innovation, but given where we're at today, we really feel confident that we could continue to do that going forward. And with that, I'm going to choose Mike Read, Heading up our International team.