Yes. I'll start, David, but even if you try to say projections if we get that specific on the future here. So as I kind of mentioned with Chris, I did mention with Chris, is PVC imports year-over-year for the last quarter, up solid double-digit percent. It's hard to estimate going forward if that will continue or if it's just people getting in before the tariffs or even to go, hey, we shipped everything we could and like they literally don't even have capacity. Again, I don't know my specific competition domestically or internationally that well to know what's in their playbook. I do perceive that, again, with all the variability of administration and tariffs that some imports were coming from China, and I would expect that to be decreased just because the current tariffs there across -- I think all products were China, but at least PVC kind of it's well over 100%. So that's not as economical for the Latin American countries, the tariff right now on the major importers is 10%. And again, that's one product. You got to remember, a lot of this we've talked about is the inefficiency of freight. So I wouldn't apply it. The whole delivered cost isn't 10% up because it's just on the product and so forth. So whatever estimate you want to say, 5%, 7% I'm making up a totally random number, but if you follow my math. But it is a headwind. I mean, it helps us as we've covered in prepared remarks, tariffs overall, and John Pregenzer discussed with the one chart are typically a good thing for Atkore going forward. As for steel conduit, they were actually in the quarter down year-over-year. So again, just like I don't want to overread into PVC, I don't want to overread into steel, but from a year-over-year perspective down there, I do think because that is I think I covered in the very beginning remarks, we're seeing for all steel conduit now with 232, where the administration removed exemptions is a 25% tariff. So again, can it be economical to bring products across, yes. but that's a higher headwind that either means whatever they do with that. But how aggressive they are, what pricing they sell at again independent companies, but that's a good thing for us. And therefore, without dimensionalizing an exact dollar, where we've held the guide is the fact that we do see tariffs helping EBITDA profits a little bit offset, as John Deitzer said, just from the standpoint that if you look into the second half, it's hard to predict the economy, good luck to the Fed over the next two days. But we could see some projects delayed, association ability and contractors and things like that. I think there was a stat in them that their contractors are seeing up to 20% of jobs delayed or possibly postponed. So we were just trying to balance good thing tariffs offset by maybe a little less volume. And as John Deitzer said, and then I'll wrap up my filibuster here is we're still projecting, let's say, low single-digit growth. But if we're at zero in the first half of the year with a good solid Q2, I mean, I'm over specific on math, if you assume 3%, don't be locked on that number for the full year. Implicitly, that means 6% and that we will -- we expect to be mid- to high-single-digit growth here in the second half of the year. So we're still pretty optimistic, but that's the balance of tariffs and volume and stuff like that.