SPRY - NASDAQ

Good day, and welcome to ARS Pharmaceuticals Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Financial Results Conference Call. At this time all participants are in listen-only mode. After the speaker’s presentation there’ll be a question-and-answer session, instructions will be provided at that time. As a reminder, this call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to Justin Chakma, the Chief Business Officer. Please go ahead.

Good morning. With me today are Richard Lowenthal, Co-Founder, President and CEO of ARS Pharma; Eric Karas, our Chief Commercial Officer; and Kathy Scott, our CFO. Earlier today, we issued a press release outlining our fourth quarter and full year 2024 results along with recent business highlights. You can find this press release on our website at ars-pharma.com. Our call today will proceed as follows: Rich will provide an overview of our corporate progress and key development and insights into the neffy launch. Eric will discuss neffy's ongoing and planned commercialization efforts in the U.S. and our market strategy, Kathy will then provide a financial overview, after which we will open the call for questions. Before we begin, please note that today's discussion includes forward-looking statements based on our current expectations. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially. Please refer to our earnings release issued today for further details and a discussion of risks. With that, I'll turn the call over to Rich.

Thank you, Justin, and thank you to everyone dialing in today. The past 6 months have been extremely productive for ARS. In September, we have successfully launched neffy 2 milligrams in the United States and secured FDA approval for the 1 milligram neffy dose for patients weighing 15 kilograms to less than 30 kilograms. The population of children at this lower weight range that will use neffy 1 milligram represents 23% of the current auto-injector market. ARS has also made significant strides in payer coverage, with over 51% commercially insured able to get neffy without a prior authorization as of April 1, and we anticipate over 80% with our prior authorization by early this summer with the addition of neffy to the Caremark formulary. Our commercial execution has established a strong foundation of healthcare provider awareness for neffy as a compelling alternative to traditional epinephrine auto-injectors, providing patients with a needle-free portable and highly effective options for severe allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis. The U.S. epinephrine market represents a $3 billion in the annual net sales near-term addressable opportunity among 6.5 million patients prescribed epinephrine in the last 3 years with an additional expansion opportunity among untreated patients of over $7 billion in annual net sales coverage an estimated 20 million patients that have been diagnosed with severe allergic reactions based on claim statement. However, only 3.2 million patients consistently fill their auto-injector prescriptions, leaving a vast population without protection. Neffy directly addresses this gap by eliminating barriers such as the needle anxiety and portability challenges. Just a few weeks ago at the 2025 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Annual Scientific Meeting we showcased nine presentations on the continuously growing body of clinical evidence demonstrating the therapeutic value of neffy to healthcare providers. Notably, among the presentations at the Quad AI meeting, a study in Japanese patients experiencing anaphylaxis symptoms after oral food challenge found that patients receiving that they experienced low symptom scores within 10 minutes compared to traditional intramuscular injection. A separate set of clinical studies in China reinforce the bracketed pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic profile of Nephew in persons with pure Chinese ethnicity demonstrating its efficacy and safety under a variety of conditions, including self-administration, allergic rhinitis, infectious rhinitis and allergy challenges and repeat dosing. An additional analysis confirmed that neffy is safe and achieved effective exposures of epinephrine for patients four years of age and older and weighing 15 kilograms to less than 30 kilograms. I'm proud of these data we presented at the Quad AI meeting as it showcases neffy extensive and rigorous clinical development program. Neffy remains the only approved product to have generated anaphylaxis efficacy data in a clinical study to have met the bracketing criteria established by FDA for approval of all key pharmacokinetic parameters to ensure safety and efficacy and to have data demonstrating that it is well tolerated in children down to 15 kilograms’ body weight to account for almost half of the patients prescribed epinephrine. This and other extensive clinical data we have previously presented on neffy's profile has now been supported by the growing real-world data of treating anaphylactic reactions from our neffy Experience Program. The data from the neffy Experience Program to date is numerically better than that historically reported with epinephrine injections. We plan to share additional details of the survey of our neffy Experience Program once we have completed the survey and plan to repeat this several times during the program as it progresses with over 2,500 clinicians having neffy for oral food challenges and immunotherapy treatment. At Quad AI, hundreds of physicians shared with us many of their positive success stories of treating patients with neffy, including cases where patients had been rescued by neffy from even having very severe anaphylactic reactions and being unconscious. Physicians are clearly and enthusiastically communicating to us that they believe that neffy represents a new standard of care. We have established a strong initial commercial trajectory in the U.S. to ultimately deliver on this expectation and establish neffy as the new standard of care. Since the initial launch in September of 2024, neffy generated $7.3 million in net product revenue in the United States, reflecting a strong early adoption since it became available in the fourth quarter and strong breadth of early prescribing with thousands of health care providers prescribing neffy reflecting the allergy community's confidence in neffy as an alternative treatment. That said, as you can see in the IQVIA prescription data, we are still on the early part of the S curve of what we anticipate to go into a multibillion-dollar blockbuster peak sales trajectory. We anticipate a significant inflection in both the depth as well as the breadth of health care provider prescribing later this year as the headwinds from the need for prior authorization requests diminish. Healthcare providers consistently tell us that the current levels of neffy prescribing represent only a fraction of their intended use of the product in the future. In fact, one leading allergist stated that he intends to switch all of his 4,000 patients, but our data shows that this doctor has only prescribed to about 1% of their patients to date given the need for these prior authorizations to get approval. A key learning in the neffy launch is the unique administrative barrier that prior authorization is posed for neffy due to the large volume of epinephrine eligible patients as well as the acute nature of this disease. This results in the need for a very large number of prior authorizations to get a significant revenue given each prior authorization translates to an average of 1.3 prescriptions per patient to date. As a result, health care providers only have bandwidth to prescribe very selectively due to the cumulative time required to prepare prior authorizations, even with simplified forms and ARS facilitation through BlinkRx. Based on the feedback from hundreds of prescribers, including most recently at the Quad AI meeting, we expect to see a tipping point in the neffy trajectory as we obtain our payer coverage goals early this summer and the prescribing more seamless for physicians. Our payer engagement strategy has already yielded multiple favorable coverage decisions, including a set the group purchasing organization for Express Scripts, 1 of the 3 largest pharmacy benefit managers in the United States who put neffy on formulary within 10 weeks of launch. In the last month, we also have signed contracts and provided patients with unrestricted access to neffy with 2 other group purchasing organizations, MSR and

Good morning, and thank you, Rich. As we've laid out previously, our net commercial strategy is focused on 3 core areas: physician education and engagement to drive neffy adoption and market share, peer coverage to ensure affordability and access to neffy and patient awareness and education to encourage adoption and prompt patients to ask their health care provider for neffy. Our team is executing very well against all 3 of these. To date, our sales team has directly engaged with approximately 9,000 health care providers. Additionally, more than 4,000 healthcare providers have submitted neffy prescriptions through BlinkRx by neffyconnect. Importantly, approximately 81% of these prescriptions were submitted by physicians in the highest decile of allergists. These are physicians who represent the highest volume prescriptions in the U.S. At the recent Quad AI meeting, we met with over 1,000 physicians and the feedback across the spectrum of stakeholders continues to reinforce the enthusiasm for a needle-free epinephrine treatment and the growing demand for neffy. Among the physicians that the teams at the conference, the feedback regarding the product was overwhelmingly positive. Many HCPs who have used neffy in a clinical setting as part of the experience program shared their experiences. One particular influential physician who is a thought leader amongst his peers had his first experience with neffy just 2 weeks before the conference. He was so impressed with the response, which appeared within a minute that he shared his experience with his colleagues and nursing team. Allergists have reported great real-world success with response rates similar to or even better than those historically reported with epinephrine injection products. As of today, approximately 2,500 allergists have enrolled in our neffy Experience Program, and as shared -- it allows for a hands-on clinical use and real-world validation of the product. This participation represents over 80% of the health care professionals conducting allergy-challenged studies, reflecting a strong interest in neffy. Our commercial team is actively sharing this information with both net experience participants and health care professionals more broadly, which reinforces their confidence in neffy's clinical profile backed by real-world response data. We have observed strong adoption by payers with positive coverage decisions from major organizations such as Express Scripts, Cigna, Optum, Navitus Health and TRICARE. The coverage enhances access to neffy for millions of commercially insured patients across the nation. Furthermore, starting April 1, UnitedHealthcare will include neffy as a covered treatment without a prior authorization. In addition, all 3 group purchasing organizations have signed contracts with us, Athens in late Q4 of last year and

Thanks, Eric. We reported our Q4 and full year 2024 financial results in a press release this morning, and I'll walk through some of the highlights. In terms of sales, we're proud to have recorded $6.7 million in neffy sales for the fourth quarter of 2024 and $7.3 million for the full year 2024 since our launch in late September. Of note, these revenues are slightly higher than the preliminary numbers that we announced mid-January. Before turning to our revenues, I'll take a minute to explain how we're treating the cash proceeds from our ALK licensing agreement that was signed in November 2024. As a reminder, we received a nonrefundable upfront cash payment of $145 million from ALK. In Q4, only $73.5 million of that payment was included in our revenues. The remaining $71.5 million is treated as a liability on the balance sheet due to GAAP accounting treatment. Specifically, $69.4 million is treated as a financing liability and $2.1 million is treated as a contract liability for future performance obligations. This GAAP accounting treatment is because of a specific term of our licensing agreement that we built in to maintain strategic optionality for the future. The agreement ensures that ARS has the option to repurchase rights for certain regions partnered out to ALK, which results in our not being able to account for a portion of the cash proceeds as revenue. So while the business and economic intent is that of a licensing agreement due to the open-ended flexibility of the reacquisition language, GAAP treats cash flows from these certain territories as a financing agreement that shows up on the balance sheet, impacting our reported revenue figures. To reiterate, there is no impact on the amount of the nonrefundable cash proceeds received, and we have sole discretion in how they are used. Going forward, none of the financing liability from the ALK agreement that appears on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2024, will be included in revenue until the expiration of the ALK agreement. We expect to receive $5 million in cash proceeds from milestones under the ALK agreements in each of Q2 and Q4 2025. Approximately half of each $5 million payment will be recognized as GAAP revenue. The other half would not be recognized as GAAP revenue, but will be added to the financing liability on the balance sheet. Future royalty payments from ALK would be recognized as GAAP revenue if they are related to the territories that are not subject to the repurchase right. Royalty payments related to territories that are subject to the repurchase right would be capitalized and added to the financing liability on the balance sheet. To summarize our 2024 revenues. Total revenue for the fourth quarter of 2024 was $86.6 million, which included $6.7 million in net product revenue from neffy sales in the United States, $73.5 million in collaboration revenue from ALK, $6 million in collaboration revenue from our licensing partner in Japan and $0.4 million in revenue from supply agreements. Full year 2024 revenue totaled $89.1 million reflecting $7.3 million in neffy sales in the U.S., $81.5 million in collaboration revenue and $0.4 million from supply agreements. The Q4 and full year 2024 revenues do not include the $71.5 million cash proceeds received from ALK that are required by GAAP to be recorded as a liability on the balance sheet. Turning to our expenses. R&D expenses for the fourth quarter and full year 2024 were $3 million and $19.6 million, respectively. These costs were primarily associated with the manufacturing of neffy to support our U.S. commercial launch, along with certain other product development costs and personnel-related expenses. Our SG&A expenses for the fourth quarter and full year 2024 were $35.5 million and $71.7 million, respectively. These primarily reflect marketing expenses and personnel-related costs associated with the commercial launch of neffy as well as general operating expenses. We had net income of $49.9 million or $0.51 per share basic and $0.48 per share diluted for the fourth quarter. Net income was $8 million or $0.08 per share basic and diluted for the full year 2024. In terms of our balance sheet and cash runway, we ended the year with $314 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. At the time of FDA approval of neffy 2-milligram in August 2024, we guided to an operating runway of at least 3 years, which budgeted in an upfront fee of about $50 million for an ex U.S. partnership. The ALK licensing agreement provide us with a significantly greater cash infusion of $145 million upfront and an additional $10 million in near-term regulatory and launch milestones expected to be attained in mid- to late 2025. As such, the combination of the capital brought in from our ALK deal along with our earlier-than-anticipated success in obtaining favorable coverage decisions from U.S. payers has given us a lot of flexibility to further invest in the commercialization of neffy, while maintaining a strong balance sheet. Looking ahead, as Eric noted, we plan to accelerate our DTC investment beginning in May in order to take advantage of the back-to-school seasonality. We are projecting a DTC campaign spend of between $40 million and $50 million in 2025. In parallel, we are working to ensure availability of the 1-milligram neffy dose for children four years or older starting in May. With this in mind, we anticipate operating expenses, excluding both cost of goods sold and stock-based compensation will be approximately $200 million to $210 million for the full year 2021. With this forecast, we still expect to maintain a runway of at least three years based on our current operating plan. I'll hand the call over to Rich now to finish up.

2024 has set up 2025 to be a pivotal year of commercial execution for neffy. Our primary focus is accelerating adoption of neffy and expanding global market access and advancing our intranasal epinephrine technology with the plan to start Phase I in Urticaria as well as our allergy challenge clinic registry study in the next few weeks. The early enthusiasm from physicians, payers and patients reinforces our confidence in neffy's potential to become a new standard of care in emergency allergy treatment. I'd like to thank the entire ARS team for their dedication in making this launch a success. We look forward to continued momentum in 2025 and beyond. With that, let's open up the call for questions.

[Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from Ryan Deschner with Raymond James. Your line is open.

Hi, good morning. And thanks for the question. Congrats on the progress. I think you mentioned that neffy 1 milligram will be available starting in May. A lot of KOLs we've spoken to has said this is the big source of demand even currently. How are you looking at the ramp for this format relative to what we've seen with the 2 mg product? And then I have a follow-up.

Yes. We believe it's additive. It's about 23% of the market. However, it's probably more than that for the impact on the sales ramp of neffy as we discuss the adoption we're seeing right now is heavily weighted towards children. So obviously, adding the younger children, which obviously, parents have more of an issue with injecting is actually -- should be very beneficial. And as we said, we expect it to be weighted -- and in 2024, it was 23% of the prescriptions for epinephrine injection. So we think the 23% will have a significant impact on our sales ramp -- or sorry, the 1 milligram, excuse me, the 23% would have a significant impact.

Got it. And then just one more. I wondering if you could give us any more detail on the progress towards the 80% access goal, which I think was more toward the end of the third quarter. It sounds like it's evolving. And what proportion of neffy sales do you expect to come from public programs like Medicaid? Thank you.

Yes. And I'll speak a little bit to that end and then Eric, if there's anything I missed you can add in. So at this point, we're at about -- as of April 1, so UnitedHealthcare came into agreement with us, and we'll put it on unrestricted access on April 1, so as of April 1, we'll be at about 51% of commercial patients will have access without prior authorization. Now it's a little over 60% total, but we actually focus on the ones that don't need the prior authorization because that's the -- what we're realizing is the major barrier to prescribing neffy for a lot of physicians, even those that are very favorable, they honestly tell us they only have so many hours in a day and weekends to write prior authorization. So it is a big headwind. With that also said, we just signed an agreement really just within the last week with

Thanks for the color. Appreciate it.

Our next question comes from Alexa Deemer with Cantor Fitzgeral. Your line is open.

Good morning, everyone. This is Alexa Deemer on for Josh Schimmer, and congrats to the ARS Pharma team on another great year. I wanted to ask what percentage of the epinephrine market is direct to patients in comparison to the broader entities like airlines and schools.

Okay. Currently, very little is being sold outside of the retail market. So almost all of our sales are retail, we are working with the two largest kit manufacturers for airlines who do want to replace other epinephrine products in the kits. Obviously, airlines have to opt in, but there's a lot of advantages to neffy between the ease of use, the lack of the needle, which reduces liability for the airlines as well as the temperature excursion data, the high temperature data, which is important in an airplane. But very little -- and Eric, you can chime in here. I don't think much, if any of our revenue is coming from outside of retail. We expect that to grow over time. But initially, it takes time for that to happen. And for example, the kit manufacturers did not want to put neffy kits until the 1 milligram was available, so they're waiting because they want -- they need both doses. So at that point, we expect that to start to pick up over time. And again, not immediately because they're not going to go throw away all their kits or replace all their epinephrine in the kids. They're going to do it over time as it expires. Eric, do you want to add anything into that?

Rich, I'll just add that when we look at our forecasting, it's really focused on the retail market. As Rich mentioned, kind of this public interest market of airlines, you can think about hotels, restaurants, law enforcement, emergency rescue, that's not included. But as time goes on in terms of education and awareness and then getting funding. We do have an opportunity in that channel. And then just one-point back to Ryan's question too, just people may be thinking this, the 1 milligram is also included in all of our payer contracts. So again, once that's available, there is no issues with the doctor writing to 1 milligram in addition to the 2 milligram.

And I'll just add one more point to that because one of the things you need in the retail market is to find a way to make it easier for some of these organizations such as restaurants to purchase neffy, right? So you can imagine a very well off restaurant can easily afford to buy a couple of boxes of neffy. Most restaurants run on fairly tight margins, so buying neffy to have in the restaurant is perhaps a hurdle. One of our largest advocacy groups actually came up with a great idea and is working on this independently of us because they want to see neffy in the restaurants, and they believe that without the needle, the liability, again, becomes much better so that good Samaritan using neffy can't hurt themselves versus an auto-injector. They're actually negotiating with several of the largest insurance companies, and I've mentioned this to a few analysts already to give a discount on their insurance if they have neffy in the restaurant or epinephrine in general. And we think that's a brilliant idea actually because that would potentially pay for the neffy or the restaurant by giving a discount on their insurance if they actually have the epinephrine in the restaurant. So those kind of things are all happening. But again, it will take some time before we start to realize significant revenue from those type of opportunities.

Awesome. Thank you and congrats again.

Our next question comes from Louise Chen with Scotia Bank. Your line is open.

Congratulations on all the progress this quarter. And thank you for taking my questions. I had a few for you. So first question I wanted to ask you was, how long does prior authorization for those payers that require you to do it? Usually, last or does it have to be renewed. The second question I had was, do you have any data that talks about that upside expansion opportunity for you and how many of those patients are actually picking up from there, those that are untreated were previously diagnosed. And then last question is I saw some headlines on the potential for epinephrine to go over the counter. I don't know if you have any thoughts on if that were to ever happen, what that would mean for you? Thank you.

Okay. So could you just repeat the questions one at a time, first question, sorry. Just to make it clear.

Yes, sure. Okay. So I wanted to ask you with respect to prior authorization, for the payers that require you to do it? How long does this usually last for? Does it have to be renewed at some point?

Yes, I think -- and Eric, you can add into this, but I believe that they need a prior authorization. I mean, again, the nature of this is a little unusual. You might only get 1 or 2 or 3 prescriptions a year, right? So they're going to get a prior authorization for that prescription. Some of them are for one, some 2, we've seen 3 prescriptions go through or 3 boxes in 1 prescription, I should say, 3 units pretty readily. But I believe they would probably need that prior authorization each time, so that's a huge burden. And if you think about the revenue, on average, right now, we're seeing 1.3 units per prescription. Now we believe that will go up significantly because a lot of those are cash pays where they're just buying 1 now, and they'll get more once it's on unrestricted coverage once their insurance company is covering it. But -- the -- if you think about it, it's only a little more than $500 in revenue to us, net revenue. So each prior authorization accounts for a very small net revenue, and that's why we believe in this category, it's a major hurdle for the doctors. Do you want to add anything to that Eric?

Yes, I would just say it's a mix. It depends on the insurer, as Rich mentioned, some will require every single time, others may be a little bit longer. But I also think it's important as we mentioned in our presentation, that we are on track to hit that 80% of coverage in commercial. And when we say that, that's covered with no PA. All of our contracts that we're putting in place with the GPOs with PBMs. Again, we're not paying any rebates if there's any type of step edit or prior authorization. So we're really confident that, again, we're lowering the barriers in time here for physicians to write this product without a PA.

Okay. And if you could just repeat your second question again?

Yes, sure. Okay. So I wanted to ask you for patients that were previously diagnosed untreated with traditional epinephrine how many of them have chosen to take your product? Just trying to assess the expansion opportunity and how that's progressing for you.

Eric, do you have that information?

We haven't broken out and done any claims analysis. We have plans to do that in the middle part of the year here. But from an opportunity perspective, as we've shared, there's 3.2 million patients that have current treatment and then you're looking at another 16.5 that are diagnosed without treatment. Within that group, we know over the last couple of years, there's 3.3 million patients that have been prescribed epinephrine about 1/3 of them have filled, but they haven't refilled. So there is an opportunity, a significant opportunity there to reengage those patients. When we talk to physicians, when we talk to patients in that group, the major reasons why they didn't refill or fill initially is because of the needle, size, portability and affordability as well. So when you look at our programs in commercial, again, if they're covered, $25 for the prescription, even if they get more than 1 carton, we only charge one co-pay, but we're able to, again, get reimbursed on 2 cartons or 3 cartons. The average co-pay for a needle injector is about $40. So I think we're removing a lot of the challenges in terms of a needle-free, easy-to-use portable option, and we do see a very significant opportunity to reengage this population whether it's through the physician or our DTC efforts that we'll launch in May.

Does that help?

Yes, can I ask one more quick question?

Yes.

The opportunity for epinephrine to go over the counter, what would that mean for you?

Yes. It's been brought up to us multiple times, including by big pharma companies. Of course, we know the inhaled epinephrine is over the counter, but it's not systemic, and it's for asthma. The 2 criteria for over-the-counter obviously, your first safety. We believe neffy is very safe, especially with only 2 doses. You can overdose on epinephrine. So that is a big risk and FDA has raised significant concerns about levels above that observed with 2 EpiPen. So that's been a big significant discussion for years and years and years that they just don't know the safety in real-world patients with levels above that. So people that might take more than 2 doses and neffy would be a concern to FDA. The other criteria is self-diagnosis. You got to be able to self-diagnose that you have the disease. And there's a lot of causes of symptoms similar to food allergies that may or may not be an actual food or venom allergy, so FDA would also have to get over that barrier of the ability of people to self-diagnose. So while it's a discussion and would be interesting I think it's a difficult hurdle for this type of product, just the profile for FDA. So I would not expect it to go TC certainly in the near future. I would not expect that to happen.

Our next question comes from Roanna Ruiz with Leerink Partners. Your line is open.

Good morning, everyone. So I was curious, what are you hoping to learn from the challenge clinic registry study for neffy that's starting in April and around how long will that run for? And as you gather this data, would you present it in sort of a rolling basis this year at medical meetings or publications?

Yes. So first of all, this is going to be the largest randomized controlled study ever done with epinephrine period. Never been a study like this done. But now that we're approved, FDA believes it's feasible, we believe it's feasible. So it will be 600 people treated 400 on neffy 200 on IM injection. And again, it will be randomized and partially blinded by partial, I mean, it's blinded up to the time the physician decides to give a dose of epinephrine. They won't know what the treatment is up to that point. The second dose would not be blinded because, of course, they know what they gave the first time it would have to be the same product the second time if they need a second dose. So this is going to be a very significant study. FDA's primary interest is safety. Again, as I mentioned, all of our clinical trials are in healthy people in the clinic not having a reaction. So FDA is very interested in seeing real-world data of all comers, basically, this study will be anyone they're going to give oral food challenge to is eligible to enroll. That would normally get epinephrine if they have a reaction. And so it's a really real-world study where you're going to get patients with asthma with all sorts of other concomitant meds. Nothing is barred in this study. So we'll get a really good sense of the safety of neffy and also of injection. So even for IM injection, I don't think we have a super good sense of that in a clinical environment like this where you're really recording things that are not just spontaneously reported, so that's the nature of the study. It's going to be -- really, it's going to be an amazing study. We will do an interim analysis. I don't think we'll do multiple rolling ones because that's just not normally done, but we probably will do an interim analysis so that at least preliminary data will be presented probably at the next Quad AI meeting and then we'll present the full data. And we will be looking at clinical outcomes as well, but those are secondaries because FDA did really focus on safety that they wanted to understand the safety of neffy have better data on the safety of neffy. We understand its side effects are very mild and very infrequent. But nonetheless, they want to see in patients that actually have a reaction and on all their concomitant meds or have all their other concomitant conditions that you typically see in this population. So that's really the main focus of the study. And we will probably do an interim analysis for Roanna. So that's helpful as well.

Yes. Got it. Interesting. And then I wanted to follow up. I thought your KOLs back that you mentioned earlier was really interesting in terms of physicians that want to switch all of their patients to neffy or possibly a majority a sense of the proportion of physicians out there that you're detailing that have this interest?

I think it's mixed. I think some we talk to Quad AI, which are really the top-tier physicians to be very honest, because they're the ones that are going for the meetings and educating themselves and I've had a number of conversations myself with a lot of these. And one -- major one told me that he just doesn't have -- he can't spend all evening and weekends writing PAs. So prior authorization. So he's kind of limited, he's picking and choosing, but he would switch almost everybody, and he thinks to all of his patients would prefer neffy. And he also noted that he -- in his region, he's a major adviser to pediatricians and general practitioners. So he had thrown out that he advises about 100 pediatricians and a couple of hundred general practitioners that have patients that contact came with questions. And he said none of them will write PAs. They just won't do it. So allergists are more flexible to write these prior authorizations where pediatricians just probably have less time. I don't know or they're not as equipped in their clinics to write prior authorization to manage it. So we said they just won't do it until that barrier clears. But even they're contacting him about neffy and wanting to prescribe especially again to the children are a primary focus of a lot of these doctors right now. But we think it's pretty prevalent. There are still a few that are waiting to see some real-world data and we're collecting real-world data from a neffy experience that looks spectacular right now. And once we get to a large enough. And right now, we can talk about it a little bit, if you want, but we're at about 758 patients treated that have been reported from 478 doctors and the data is coming in really like it's working at least as well as injection possibly even better. But nonetheless, once we get to maybe a couple of thousand, we might do a publication of basically a letter to the editor -- one of the major publications to give some data. And I think that's what they're -- a lot of them are waiting for. They're waiting to see, especially the less -- let's say, academic scientific doctors that understand the data well. The other one, they're like, well, okay, let me see it used in a bunch of patients and it's working well, and then I'll describe. And then they all agree this is a much better profile, much better product than injection for their patients, but still a lot have that hesitation. So that's another -- one of the other 2 or 3 things we're focused on is really that access, unrestricted access, making the doctors comfortable and getting real-world data for them that it's really working equal to injection, and then the third is make is raising awareness among the patients and caregivers that neffy is available and they can go get it unrestricted without complications. They're high fees. That's going to be a big initiative as well. And that's why we're aligning our DTC campaign with that access occurring and -- some people say north of 50% is already good enough to start driving patients into the doctors. We're actually going to start that process when we're hopefully closer to the 80% mark so that people will get it very easily and without high co-pay.

Make sense. Thanks a lot.

Our next question comes from Lachlan Hanbury-Brown with William Blair. Your line is open.

Hi guys. Thanks for taking the questions. I guess the first one is just -- can you talk about the system that you have to go back to doctors or patients who were written a script and it wasn't approved once you get coverage with the insurer and sort of the system you haven't maybe what you've seen from that so far as you've won.

Two different things I would separate. If it's through BlinkRx our online pharmacy, then BlinkRx is obviously keeping record of all patients who are denied a prior authorization or who even filed a prior authorization. So we have all that data and their contact information because they went through BlinkRx. So as insurers are added to coverage and we get unrestricted coverage with new insurers, they can go back and inform the patient as well as the doctor that, that patient is now covered and can go back and get neffy without a prior authorization. So that's one thing I think Eric's team is doing quite effectively. The other is a little harder to deal with if it was a script written through a pharmacy. And of course, even if we have the cash pay in place or patient goes and they don't have that co-pay assistance you could have a lot of people walk away from the script that we don't want. We want them to go to the pharmacy and have that $25 co-pay. So in that regard, we're doing a couple of things. The sales force is really tasked with informing the doctors that their patients are now covered for, let's say, United as of April 1, right? So another couple of weeks, if you're a UnitedHealth patient, which is about 8% of the United States commercial insurance, you can now go back and get that script again? Or if the script is still valid, just go back to the pharmacy and get neffy and not have to have the prior authorization. On top of that, we also don't want patients to walk away from a co-pay. So if they have a with United if they have an $80 co-pay. Just throwing out a number, just as an example, but you have an $80 co-pay for neffy with United, and you don't want to pay $80, but you would easily pay $25 you have to have our coupon from our website from your smartphone to give to the pharmacists. We are now working very hard with both CVS and really Health to sign agreements to preload that card. So when patients and caregivers go to the pharmacy, it will be automatic that they won't they won't have to have the coupon and if they forgot the coupons. And surprisingly, even somebody I know who's used neffy multiple times already, she has a lot of different allergies and she's a very smart person, very -- she actually paid $200 for neffy and she had authorization. She had prior authorization approved or insurance coverage, and I was shocked. And I said, well, didn't you use the coupon and. I don't like -- so we don't want that because she obviously could afford and she didn't think anything of $200. But to a lot of people, $200 as a barrier, and we'll walk away from the script. So we're trying to get that done as well to make sure that it's seamless, meaning you get your script from the doctor, you go to the local pharmacy you hand the script to the pharmacy or sent electronically, of course, these days, so you don't actually have a physical script, but you go into the pharmacy and they just say, your copay is $25, and you walk away happy. And that's really what we're trying to get to make that as seamless as possible for the vast majority of the population as quickly as possible and especially going into this summer.

Great. I mean, can you comment on the sort of coverage that you've won so far? Have you seen many of those groups, for example, the ones through BlinkRx go back in that filled? Or are those patients maybe when the initial script is denied, do they just get a script for an auto injector?

Yes. I'll refer Eric. Eric, do you have any information on that as to when BlinkRx goes back after coverage?

Yes. Lachlan, we are seeing a percentage of those patients convert -- we have a protocol in place, as Rich mentioned, once we get coverage, and we've been doing this over the last couple of weeks, we're reengaging those patients. A portion of those patients opted to go to the cash prescription. But the other ones, we're getting a nice amount of them kind of coming back and saying, okay, hey, great, now that my insurance is covering this. It's affordable. They're moving from kind of a submitted prescription that's waiting to obviously a dispensed prescription that they have. So we're not only doing that, as Rich said, with Blink, but our field team is also trained to engage the doctors on all these updates really working close with the staff because it's they're carrying that workload to of working with the patients and going through that process. So the field team has data based on each position of what payers their patient base represents and they're messaging accordingly. So we're pulling that through and driving that, all those wins that we're seeing.

Great, thanks. Can I ask a follow-up? Go ahead.

No, no. I was just going to add that, again, a lot of people are telling us that they're just getting -- if they're not covered, they're getting one now, but they want more than one prescription, so they're getting on now at the cash pay price of $1.99 and then they're waiting for coverage to -- for their insurer to cover neffy so they can go back and get more because that seems to be a common strategy, common theme we're hearing from patients and caregivers that they just want the one initially. And I know we just spoke to somebody an advocacy person in Utah state advocacy person that's working on the legislation in Utah and her kids both have this disease. And she has neffy, she was just waiting for her cases, everything she wants her kids to carry it, right? She just loves neffy because their kids can actually carry it. So she went out and got it. And I'm sure she'll get more prescriptions, you just wanted to get 1 for each of the kids initially so that they have the neffy in their hands walking around with it, and they're really thrilled about it. So that's the kind of feedback we get all the time and heard from a lot of people already in that kind of mode of -- I'll pay for the 1 at the $1.99, but then I'll wait for insurance for more.

Okay. Great. That's great context. And as a follow-up, you've talked about how sort of access and getting the payer coverage is really important to driving prescription because of that prior authorization burden. Can you talk about the maybe lag that you see there? I mean how quickly -- when you sign a new contract so far when you signed new contracts and got on formulary. Are you able to see an uptick in prescribing over the following weeks or a couple of months? Or like how should we think about what that sort of delay.

It's a great question because I just asked that question yesterday of my team. And I think they're still collecting to date. I don't know, Eric, if you have it, I haven't seen it yet, but the example is kind of like Express Scripts, which started now a couple of months ago, it really kind of hit with Express Scripts. So how are the sales going now in the patients under Express Scripts versus other insurance companies, which may have only recently added neffy? So it's not -- the data won't be as impactful. But I don't know, Eric, do we have any sense of that yet?

Yes. We are looking at individual cohorts of patients based on insurance. I can tell you that the last couple of weeks, especially with like Express Scripts, we're seeing an incline there in terms of share relative to what we see in the overall average. So that's what we expect to see. And for each of those plans that we're winning, we're driving that through messaging, whether it's non-personal promotion through marketing, but most importantly, through our direct efforts with our field team interacting with doctors, interacting with staff. I would say also that it takes time when the patient comes in, right, certain patients see their doctor every 6 months, others maybe every year. But when they come in, now the doctor knows that if that patient has Express Scripts starting April 1, United that this is going to be covered without a prior authorization. So we are encouraged by what we're seeing in terms of the increases here and it does really create a nice opportunity for us over the next couple of weeks and especially going into the kind of the May back-to-school season with a lot of patients coming in to really drive this.

And just to add 1 more things to that. I know we're actually going a little over time a little bit. But we just are now working with advocacy and our website posting a scorecard. We wanted to wait until we cross that 50% mark if United gets us there. but we're putting the scorecard and the advocacy groups are going to post this on their websites as well under their neffy description, where it's going to show who's covering without any restrictions, without any prior authorization, who's covering, but is still requiring prior authorization again, I don't differentiate between the insurer that's covering with prioritization on that's not covering at all. And then who's not covering it all. And there's two purposes of this. One is that I want I want the patients to know they're covered and the caregivers, right? And the doctors, so the scorecard is also being shared by our sales force with the doctors. But I also want them to know who's not covering because if your insurer is not covering and you see this whole list of insurers that are and you go and call up your insurer and say, hey, why are you guys not covering this and all these other insurers are covering it. We think that puts a lot of pressure on insurance companies to cover more quickly. So that's another strategy we have to try to facilitate that by now starting to make it very public who is covering without this prior authorization requirement and who is not, and we're hoping that, that will also start to have some impact over time.

Our next question comes from Julian Harrison with BTIG. Your line is open.

Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. And congrats on all the recent progress. On the CSU Phase 2b trial you expect to initiate in the next few weeks, I'm wondering if you could remind us of the competitive positioning here. And any early feedback you have on preference for episodic relief versus chronic therapies in CSU?

Yes. Well, first of all, they're very independent, okay, because these people are all in chronic therapy, right? So you could be on chronic antihistamine high-dose enters gene therapy or high-dose XOLAIR and you still have flares. So what there is no current therapy for is to flares, meaning you're on XOLAIR and you're stable, but every couple of months, you have a big episode where you've got a couple of days to two days of severe symptoms, all of a sudden, and it's very, very upsetting to these people. And a lot of times, they get not only the itchy and painful, but they also sometimes get angioedema facial angioedema, so their lip swells up, their cheek swells up, they don't want to go to work. They don't want to go out, while that's happening. So the difference is you're on your chronic therapy and then you have a flare and now you can have an immediate treatment to treat that flare and resolve it within minutes and then go back and just go back to your daily life, go to work, go wherever you want to go, versus go to the hospital and get -- the other current ways they deal with this flare is you either just tolerate it and hope -- or wait for it to go away because it will go away. And you -- or you go to the hospital and get IV antihistamines at very high doses tends to be effective in a lot of cases. And then the other is to take a steroid, which takes hours to take effect, okay? So neffy would provide a unique advantage of treating that acute event. While they're on chronic therapy, so it's synergistic with chronic therapy. I just want to make sure it's clear that we are not intending to replace chronic Urticaria therapy at all. This is a supplemental treatment to treat that exacerbation that occurs. And if you go back to the XOLAIR Phase III studies that were published, People on XOLAIR even will have three to six of these events a year. And then -- well, they actually more than 3 to six events, I should take that back. It was -- they went to the emergency room three to six times a year to treat this type of event. So -- so it's a pretty significant issue even on chronic therapies like XOLAIR. Now there are a portion of people that are just stable on XOLAIR antihistamines that never have these events but there's a large proportion of people that have these events. So it is an unmet medical need. We're not proposing to replace chronic urticaria therapies. We're looking at supplementing them. Does that help?

That's very helpful. Thank you. And congrats again.

Okay, thank you. Great.

And I'm not showing any further questions at this time. I'd like to turn the call back over to Richard.

Okay. Well, I really appreciate everybody joining the call and look forward to the next conference call when we get closer to that summer period. Obviously, we think at that point, we're hoping to see a significant uptick in scripts and then going into the summer when our DTC campaign starts in May. We really start raising that awareness. And we think you'll really enjoy our DTC campaign where we've been working very hard, and we think it will be very, very positive shifting the thinking, shifting the paradigm towards neffy easy, easy to carry, easy to use and not threatening and treat the symptoms immediately and they'll wait for severe anaphylactic disease. So we think that, that will really shift the paradigm towards earlier and earlier use of epinephrine in order to stop the symptoms immediately when a reaction occurs. And that's really how doctors want to see epinephrine used. So with that, I'll close the call.