Thank you, Shiraz. Before I give an update on the portfolio, let me spend a minute reminding shareholders that our multi-strategy investment approach, which spans both specialty and sponsor finance credit investments is designed to deliver consistent returns and protect capital across market cycles. Asset-backed strategies often exhibit countercyclical characteristics, benefiting from periods of market volatility and capital dislocation, while sponsor finance can outperform in periods of economic expansion and robust M&A activity. The low correlation between these investment strategies enhances portfolio stability while diversified exposure enables us to capture shifting market dynamics without compromising our credit discipline. As Michael indicated, we've deliberately tilted the portfolio to specialty finance investments, which we believe offer superior downside protection and more actionable risk controls relative to traditional sponsor finance-only portfolios. Our specialty finance strategies include ABL, life science and equipment finance and are underpinned by high-quality collateral such as accounts receivable, finished goods inventory, commercial loan portfolios, essential use equipment, as well as intellectual property. In most cases, the assets are governed by dynamic borrowing base frameworks, which enable real-time monitoring of the underlying asset performance and leverage to manage our exposure, which include eligibility tightening, advanced rate adjustments, and cash dominion. Unlike sponsor finance loans that can delay active lender engagement, especially in the finance investments, allow us to engage early with our borrower intervene proactively and take steps to ensure repayments. In the current market environment, the relative value in specialty finance is especially compelling, not only offering greater structural protection and real-time risk monitoring, but also delivering what we believe is a superior risk-adjusted return profile compared to cash flow lending. Our flexibility to allocate capital to the most attractive risk/return investment opportunities is especially critical in a market where selectivity and downside risk mitigation or paramount. Now, let me turn to the portfolio. At quarter end, the comprehensive investment portfolio consisted of $3.1 billion of investments with an average exposure of approximately $3.2 million. Measured at fair value, 98.2% of our portfolio consisted of senior secured loans with 96.4% invested in first lien loans, including investments in our SSLP and only 0.2% was invested in second lien cash flow loans with the remaining 1.6% invested in second lien asset-based loans. At quarter end, our weighted average yield on the portfolio was 12.2%, up from 12.1% in the prior year-end. Based on our quantitative risk assessment scale, our portfolio currently has one of the strongest credit profiles in our history. At quarter end, the weighted average risk rating was under two based on our 1 to 4 risk rating scale, with 1 representing the least amount of risk. Just under 90% of the portfolio is rated two or higher, moreover 99.4% on a cost basis and 99.6% on a fair value basis was performing with only one investment on non-accrual. Now let me touch on each of the four investment verticals. Cash flow, sponsor finance. In this business, we originate first lien senior secured loans to middle market companies in non-cyclical industries, such as healthcare, business services and financial services. This has helped to mitigate the impact on the portfolio from cyclical economic factors. At quarter end, this portfolio was just under $590 million across 35 borrowers, representing 19% of our comprehensive portfolio. With approximately 99% of this portfolio invested in first lien loans, we believe we are well positioned to withstand pressures that our borrowers may face. Our borrowers have a weighted average EBITDA of approximately $90 million and carry low LTVs of under 44%. Sponsor finance, the portfolio company average EBITDA and revenue growth continues to be in the mid-single digits year-over-year. Overall, they have successfully managed the transition to an environment with higher cost of capital as well as inflationary premiums. Weighted average interest coverage on this portfolio increased to two times from 1.8 times the prior quarter. Additionally, only 2% of our gross income is in the form of capitalized PIC income from cash flow borrowers, resulting from amendments. During the quarter, we made investments of $45 million in first lien cash flow loans and had repayments of $73 million. As Michael mentioned, sponsor finance deal flow continues to be muted due to lower M&A volume and we are selectively letting investments go in connection with refinancings if the new risk return profiles do not meet our criteria. As credit investors focused on downside protection, our ability to say no and pass on opportunities that don't meet our high hurdle, can often be measured by the investments that we don't do. At quarter end, the weighted average cash flow yield was 10.4% compared to 10.6% at year-end. Thus far, in 2025, there's not been a significant uptick in M&A and the supply demand for middle market debt supporting sponsor finance transactions remains out of balance. In addition, the introduction of punitive tariffs has led to economic uncertainty, resulting in widened spreads for new issuance US middle market debt. That said, wider spreads do not compensate for poor credit risk, and we will remain highly selective. Now let me turn to our specialty finance segments. Across the board, the credit quality of these investments continues to be solid with attractive LTVs, which have meaningful collateral support and borrowing base structures. Let me first discuss our asset-based lending portfolio. At quarter-end, this portfolio totaled $1.1 billion across 254 issuers, representing 37% of the comprehensive portfolio. Regional domestic banks have continued to adjust their business models in a higher rate environment and are retreating from the ABL market, creating an attractive opportunity for SLR's ABL team. Under tighter credit regulations, regional banks ABL loans to non-rated companies are bumping into higher risk capital charges, making those business lines economically less attractive for the banks. SLR is positioned to collaborate with regional banks who are shifting their ABL strategies in reaction to these challenges. Our late acquisition last -- late last year acquisition of the loan portfolio and servicing platform from Webster Commercial Services is an example of this. Integration of the portfolio went smoothly, and it's performing in line with our expectations. For the first quarter, we had approximately $164 million of new ABL investments and repayments of just under $100 million. The weighted average asset level yield was 13.8%, compared to 14.6% in the prior quarter. Additionally, we're continuing to see opportunities to provide ABL facilities to traditional cash flow borrowers who are experiencing tightening liquidity pressures. Some sponsor-backed borrowers who had access to the cash flow and BSL market in a lower rate environment are now more receptive to our ABL solutions in order to provide incremental capital. These ABL facilities carve out working capital assets that are pledged to our borrowing base, which support the loan and will provide liquidity for the borrower. The new business pipeline has also expanded as fallen angel credits and other businesses seek additional liquidity in light of macroeconomic headwinds. Access to the larger SLR platform has allowed SLRC to speak for bigger hold sizes and accordingly win more business, which led to our ABL team recently originating some of the largest investments in the company's history. Finally, our ABL teams added new business development personnel, including senior level hires and origination professionals last year and continue to do so in 2025. Now, let me touch on equipment finance. At quarter end, this portfolio totaled just over $1 billion, representing approximately 36% of our comprehensive portfolio and was highly diversified across 636 unique borrowers. Credit profile of this portfolio remained stable quarter-over-quarter. During the first quarter, we originated $128 million of new assets with the majority of this coming from our business that provides leases to investment-grade borrowers for mission-critical equipment. We had repayments of approximately $173 million. Weighted average asset-level yield was 11.5%. Our investment pipeline has expanded in conjunction with the disruption caused by last year's regional bank failures, and we are seeing demand from our borrowers to extend leases on equipment rather than buying new equipment at higher tariff-adjusted prices. Finally, let me turn to our Life Science portfolio. Quarter end, this portfolio totaled $187 million across eight borrowers. Just under 89% of this portfolio is invested in companies that have over 12 months of cash runway. Additionally, all of our life science portfolio companies have revenues and at least one product in the commercialization stage, which significantly derisked our investments. Life Science investments represented 6% of the portfolio and contributed 13% of our gross investment income for the quarter. During the first quarter, the team funded $25 million in one new investment and had $45 million of repayments. At quarter end, the weighted average yield on our Life Science portfolio including success fees, but excluding warrants, was 12.5% compared to 12.1% in the prior quarter. While the U.S. remains the most robust global market for biotech innovation, and venture funds continue to sit on record levels of dry powder, recent cuts at the FDA and NIH will likely affect research, innovation and public health initiatives with anticipated disruptions to the pipeline for new medical innovations. Initial signs of recovery from lower-than-normal originations in life sciences are expected this year. But it may take more time for a substantial market reset until greater policy clarity is realized, should result in improved investor confidence, increased investment and M&A activity. In the interim, we will continue to focus on later-stage life science companies, which are in or preparing for commercialization with very live FDA-related risk that seek non-dilutive capital to fund commercial scale up. Lastly, let me touch on our SSLP. During the first quarter, we earned income of $1.9 million, representing a 15.7% annualized yield consistent with the prior quarter. During the quarter, we made $6.6 million of new investments and had repayments of approximately $20 million. At quarter end, the SSLP had additional investment capacity in excess of $70 million and a portfolio of fair value. Now let me turn the call back to Michael.