Thanks, Chris. I'll cover our financial results in 3 parts. First, I'll review our balance sheet, net leverage and cash flow-related items. Second, I'll walk through our segment performance as well as consolidated revenue and adjusted EBITDA results for the quarter. And third, I'll provide our outlook for the third quarter and key financial metrics for full year 2025. Turning to Slide 11. Our balance sheet remains the industry's longest maturity profile, but more importantly, it positions us well to participate in what we expect to be a period of renewed M&A activity within the sector. During the second quarter, we opportunistically repurchased approximately $81 million in face value of STG's 2027 notes for $77 million, capturing immediate value. We ended the quarter with first out, first lien net leverage at 1.8x and net leverage at 5.7x based on a trailing 8-quarter calculation. Capital expenditures of $17 million were well below our guidance range, primarily reflecting project timing within the year. Our liquidity position remains strong with a fully undrawn $650 million revolver and consolidated cash of over $616 million, including approximately $224 million at SBG and nearly $393 million at Ventures. This financial strength, combined with no meaningful debt maturities until the end of 2029, gives us significant optionality. On Slide 12, we highlight our second quarter segment results. Local Media and Tennis Channel delivered adjusted EBITDA of $99 million and $13 million, respectively, well above the midpoint of our guidance ranges. In the Local Media segment, distribution revenue of $380 million was 1% below the prior year quarter and came in slightly below our expectations, largely driven by lower- than-expected subscriber growth for virtual MVPDs. Note that distribution revenue is still up 1% for the first half of 2025 compared to the prior year, as Chris referenced earlier. Core advertising revenue of $272 million was within our guidance range, but was down by 4.7% year-over-year on an as-reported basis as macroeconomic and tariff-related pressures continued to weigh on certain key categories. Media expenses of $542 million were $23 million favorable to the low end of our guidance range, driven by cost savings resulting from lower sales-related and employee costs from open positions, deferred timing on certain initiatives and successful resolution of various outstanding FCC matters during the quarter, which allowed us to reverse approximately $13 million in previously accrued expenses. However, please note that only $3 million of these reversals are favorably impacting adjusted EBITDA for the quarter. Tennis Channel delivered total revenue of $68 million, up 1% versus the prior year quarter, but below our guidance, driven by softer advertising trends. Adjusted EBITDA of $13 million was at the high end of our guidance range. Turning to Slide 13. Consolidated media revenue of $777 million came in a touch below our guidance range, primarily due to softer- than-anticipated distribution revenue driven by slower-than-anticipated virtual MVPD growth. Year-over-year performance reflects the expected industry dynamics in a nonpolitical year. Media revenue declined $42 million versus the prior year, driven by the expected reduction in political advertising revenue in this nonelection year and the absence of material Diamond management fees. However, core advertising revenue grew $13 million year-over-year on an as-reported basis, which includes contribution from our Digital Remedy acquisition. Note that Digital Remedy, the now combined Compulse and Digital Remedy businesses recorded $38 million of revenue and $7 million of adjusted EBITDA in the second quarter. Distribution revenue for the quarter was essentially flat year-over-year as rate increases offset subscriber churn. Turning to Slide 14. Consolidated adjusted EBITDA of $103 million exceeded the midpoint of our guidance range. This outperformance was driven by lower-than-anticipated media expenses due to cost savings and reversal of prior FCC expense accruals as noted earlier in segment results. As compared to last year, adjusted EBITDA declined by $55 million, reflecting expected impact of $42 million in lower media revenue, combined with $11 million in higher media expenses driven by network programming fee increases, production costs and annual compensation adjustments. Once again, please note the media expenses do not reflect the benefit of prior period reversals of certain expense accruals related to FCC matters. On Slide 15, we introduced our detailed third quarter 2025 guidance. Note that our guidance does not incorporate any anticipated or pending M&A activity. Consolidated media revenue of $744 million to $768 million reflects the anticipated year-over-year decline in political advertising revenue as we cycle against a strong 2024 election year. Core advertising revenue is expected to be in the range of $303 million to $314 million as specific categories remain pressured, although as Rob noted earlier, we are seeing some signs of stabilization. Distribution revenue is expected to be modestly lower at the midpoint of our range versus prior year, driven by several factors. One, traditional MVPD subscriber churn continues, though industry-wide trends appear to be moderating. Note that while we are encouraged by improving churn metrics announced by our largest MVPDs, we have not yet seen these improvements translate into our subscriber numbers, though we do expect to see some improvement in the coming quarters. Number two, partial offset provided by continued subscriber growth at virtual MVPDs, albeit at a slower rate and rate increases later in the quarter. And number three, keep in mind, we have a negative impact from our completed divestiture of 4 markets to Rincon Broadcasting, which closed in July. Consolidated adjusted EBITDA guidance of $71 million to $93 million reflects these revenue dynamics while maintaining operational excellence and cost discipline. Turning to Slide 16, we present our full year 2025 guidance for key financial metrics. Two things to note here. Number one, the most notable change is that we have substantially reduced our cash tax expense guidance to $46 million at the midpoint, which is a $74 million improvement from our guidance provided last quarter. This favorable revision is primarily driven by significantly lower forecasted federal tax payables resulting from the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in July. And number two, just as a reminder, net interest expense includes $68 million of refinancing fees and expenses that were expensed in the first quarter when we completed our comprehensive debt refinancing. With that, let me now turn the call back to Chris for closing remarks before we open the call to Q&A.