Thanks a lot, two very good questions. The Versamune platform is first being developed with PDS0101. PDS0101, we really see as a proof of concept study for the platform. Just based upon what’s happened with the T-cell activating technologies over the last couple of decades, we believe it’s very important for us to really demonstrate this strong proof of concept for the industry to really understand the potential of PDS0101. As you know, we’ve also performed pre-clinical studies with PDS0102, which is utilizing the same platform in TARP-specific tumors, so these would address prostate cancer and breast cancer. We have also performed those preclinical studies with PDS0103 that addresses MUC1 positive cancer, so these are cancers like ovarian cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer and colon cancer. In preclinical studies, we have demonstrated that we can generate the same levels of multi-functional tumor targeted killer T-cells with each of these products, so really with the PDS0101 now, our goal is really to get this rapidly into commercialization. PDS0101, as you know, addresses all types of HPV-associated cancers; however, we have an initial focus on head and neck cancer, which is the largest and most rapidly growing of these HPV indications. As I mentioned, I think on the last call, we had a meeting with the FDA regarding the triple combination, which we intend to also move initially into head and neck cancer. We also have the studies ongoing currently at Mayo Clinic which is looking at early stage as a new adjuvant treatment in patients who have oral cancer ahead of their surgical removal of the lesion, so we’re really looking to position, strongly position PDS0101, which is the first Versamune-based product, as a therapy for head and neck cancers from early stage treatment all the way through recurrent metastatic and checkpoint refractory patients. We want PDS0101 to be synonymous with head and neck cancer treatment, and we believe based on our partnerships with the National Cancer Institute, what we’re doing with Mayo Clinic, that we will be able to successfully achieve this. We then also, as you know, have started studies in cervical cancer. The National Cancer Institute actually looked at all types of HPV-associated cancers, so we have very strong evidence that PDS0101 has potential far beyond just head and neck cancer but broadly applied in HPV-associated cancers. As I mentioned, this is a proof of concept study, and we do intend to move PDS0102 and 0103 also rapidly into the clinic. PDS0103, as we mentioned on this call, we intend to file the IND for PDS0103 which addresses MUC1 related cancers--MUC1 positive cancers to allow that to also go into the clinic after--so that would be the second product coming after PDS0101. Also, we also have a business development strategy, so we are looking to selectively and advantageously partner some of these programs to move them rapidly into the commercialization path. Moving onto the second question you asked, which is our partnerships with NIH, I think one of the key things that doesn’t really become very obvious very often is the importance of the partnership with the National Cancer Institute, partnerships with folks like MD Anderson and Mayo Clinic. These partnerships have come about after several years of many of these partners actually independently in preclinical studies studying our technology, completely independent of PDS, and convincing themselves that these technologies, our Versamune technology as well as our tumor antibody conjugated IL12, has the potential to significantly advance the science of clinical oncology. These experts are looking for technologies that can advance clinical science. They are going to do their studies completely independent of what PDS is thinking or what PDS wants to see, so from PDS’ perspective, we have to have enough confidence in our science and our technology that when we hand our technology over to experts, such as the NIH, MD Anderson and Mayo Clinic, that we are comfortable with them reporting whatever they find regarding our technology and our science. So far, as we can see from the results, they have provided strong validation, independent validation of the science and technology, and the interest of these experts and key opinion leaders in transitioning this from preclinical studies into human clinical trials and being interested in putting some of their own capital into progressing these trials is a very strong validation of the science and the opinion of the key experts that this has the potential to significantly advance the science of clinical oncology. To date, we have eight Phase II clinical trials ongoing and five of these trials are partnered with the National Cancer Institute, and so what you can see here is that based upon these partnerships and this buy-in to the science that PDS Biotechnology is developing, we are able to progress a lot more clinical trials than we typically would at a significantly lower cost to PDS Biotechnology. We are able to really advance these programs, and what this allows us to do now is to understand how PDS0301, for example, our tumor targeted IL12, behaves in certain solid tumors, how it synergizes with standard of care technologies, for example, so dealing with chemotherapy docetaxel. We’re also looking at combinations with radiation, we’re looking at monotherapies, and we’re doing the same with the triple combination, so this allows us then to look at the Phase II data, determining which combinations and which indications we have the best chance to rapidly commercialize these products. We see this relationship with the National Cancer Institute that’s a really strong validation. They are key experts in these fields and they also provide PDS with a lot of expert oversight and guidance in terms of how we design these trials in all things, what specific indications we look for. They have seen--almost every technology that’s been successful in oncology has actually gone through the National Cancer Institute, so it’s a very valuable relationship to PDS Biotechnology.