Dr. Jennifer Buell
Mayank, thank you very much, and I especially appreciate your very provocative question about approval based on our randomized Phase 2 data that’s being collected. I’ll come to that in just a moment. So, for KOL feedback, this is a true opportunity for us to have, actually, the lead investigator, Dr. Yelena Janjigian, speak independently about this. I believe she will be the presenter of data for an upcoming conference, particularly the clinical data. She’s been deeply involved with our interrogation of the results, of course, the accumulation of patients as she’s leading the trial, but also the interpretation of our observations. She’s quite intrigued and very motivated to continue this trial. We have not yet expanded enrollment into the trial. We’re still accumulating the patients onto the currently estimated 40 patients into the program. She is very bullish, I’ll say, and I’ll have her speak for herself. She’ll be willing to do so, as well as her investigator, Dr. Sam Cytryn, who is also an investigator at Memorial Sloan Kettering. This is enrolling at nine centers at this time, so she expanded the program to enable greater access to patients. That essentially underscores the sentiment that she has for this program. We also have the continued support and we’re grateful for the continued support, funding-wise, from Stand Up To Cancer and so they remain really steadfast in their commitment to advancing this innovative approach for patients. As -- with respect to will this program be registrational, we’re going to continue to accumulate as much data as possible and demonstrate the clinical benefit for all patients. And then, of course, we’ll be advancing this into regulatory discussions. We are all seeking the most aggressive and efficient path to get global access to patients, particularly with second-line gastric, where there is nothing available. We’re really quite intrigued because these patients who are having -- these are patients who have not responded to Full Fox [ph] or PD-1, which, again, underscores the reactivation of what these cells can do for patients. For PRAME-TCRs, now, iNKTs, as I just mentioned in my last response to Emily is how valuable they are with respect to their delivery and their tolerability, and no HLA matching, no lymphodepletion. They’re durable. And they’re really quite selective and potent. And as you might recall, because of their invariant TCR, which is common in all of us, I can take one donor’s TCR, give them to another and they bind to an important lipid ligand, CD1d. Once they do that, they recruit T cells, conventional T cells and NK cells. So in addition to their endemic response locally, their conversion, suppression of myeloid-derived suppressor cells that we demonstrate now immunologically, they also recruit T cells, conventional T cells and NK cells. That’s highly different than what’s currently available to patients from any other PRAME targeting approach. And we’ve demonstrated that. The data are available on our website and perhaps we’ll push it out again, maybe on X, so that you’ll have rapid access to some of the data that we’ve previously presented.