Thank you, John. I'll begin on Slide 8. Growing non-interest bearing deposits is a priority for us. Average non-Interest bearing deposits increased 13% year-over-year and comprised over 16% of average deposits compared to 14% a year ago. Our teams continued open new checking accounts which were up 18% year-over-year. The growth of non-interest bearing deposits is helping to mitigate the overall rise in deposit costs. Slide 9 shows our deposit rates move compared to the fed funds. Last quarter, we outlined that because of our liability sensitivity, our ability to control deposit rate increases is a key factor in the net interest margin outlook. We have done a good job of limiting deposit rate increases so far in 2022. Deposit costs increased 8 basis points, 29 basis points in second quarter, compared to 21 basis points of the first quarter. This implies deposit beta of less than 9% compared to over 40% for the last cycle. The pace and magnitude of rate increases this cycle will pressure deposit costs and we expect deposit betas will rise at a faster rate in the next quarter. Slide 10 outlines loan portfolio and yields. Net loans, excluding PPP loans, increased 3% year-over-year. With the exception of the PPP loans, which continue to be forgiven, loan growth is broad based with real estate and business banking loans each rising 3% quarter-over-quarter. The loan pipeline of $583 million is up 35% year-over-year and remains near record levels. Over the past year, loan yields are flat but increased in the second quarter. Core loan yields increased 11 basis points, while base loan yields grew seven basis points quarter-over-quarter. Additionally, the spread between the yield on the originations and satisfactions excluding PPP turned positive for the first time since the Fed cut rates at the start of the pandemic. Slide 11 provides more detail on the repricing of the loan portfolio. We have nearly $1 billion of loans that are hedged or tied to short-term rates like Prime, LIBOR and SOFR, which will reprice within the next quarter and at least twice in 2022. Approximately $320 million of the remaining portfolio reprices through the end of the year. This $1.3 billion of loans represents approximately 25% of interest bearing deposits, which serves as a natural hedge for Fed rate moves. An additional $980 million of loans will reprice in 2023. This chart also shows the current rate for the maturity repricing bucket and the contractual repricing rate based on the indices as of June 30, 2022. For example, in 2023, nearly $1 billion of loans should reprice 154 basis points higher based on the contractual rates as of June 30. While we expect the loans to reprice the contractual rate, repricing current market rates and competition. If the indices continue to raise as Fed increases rates, repricing rates will continue to move higher. Our loans will repriced over longer time, and that is why it is imperative we manage our deposit pricing. Slide 12 outlines the net interest income and margin trends. The GAAP net interest margin was 3.35% and decreased one base point during the quarter. Net interest income increased 2% quarter-over-quarter to a record $65 million. Core net interest income, which removes the impact of net gains from fair value adjustments and purchase accounting accretion increased 3% quarter-over-quarter as the core net interest margin expanded two basis points 3.33%. This rate cycle has been different from past cycles, given the pace and magnitude of rate moves. So I wanted to provide some color on the net interest margin outlook. While core loan yields rose faster than the core deposit yields in the second quarter, this positive spread will be challenging to achieve going forward as the magnitude of the rate moves is expected to pressure deposit rates. Second, the base net interest margin for the second quarter was 3.22%. At June 30, the base net interest margin is approximately 20 basis points lower. To conclude, while we did a good job of maintaining the net interest margin to date in this rising rate cycle, it will become challenging given the pace and magnitude of future rate increases. Moving on to asset quality on Slide 13, we have a long history of strong credit quality primarily due to our low credit risk profile and conservative underwriting. This has served us well through many cycles. And as you can see, our losses have been well below the industry and any asset class that caused a rise in losses in the past have been exited or underwriting has been significantly tightened. For the quarter, net recoveries were three basis points driven largely by recoveries and previously charged off taxi medallion loans. We remain comfortable with the overall risk of the portfolio and the increase in non-performing assets starts from a very low base. Generally, there are two sources of repayment for real estate loans. The first source is the cash flows from the net operating income of the building with the second being the collateral. Greater than 87% of the loan portfolio is secured by real estate with an average loan to value less than 38% and only $22 million or less than 1% has a loan to value of 75% or more. For these reasons, we are comfortable with the credit quality and the limited loss content if there is an economic downturn affecting the credit markets. The multi-family commercial real estate loans are 65% of total loans. These portfolios have strong cash flows with a weighted average debt service coverage ratio of 1.8 times. During underwriting, the rate on these loans is shocked 200 basis points to determine if the borrow has sufficient repayment capacity in a rising rate environment. For these portfolios that are due to reprice over the next three years, the weighted average pro forma debt service coverage would still be greater than 1.25 times with a 200 basis point rate shock. We also stress test this portfolio for rising operating costs. Assuming a 10% increase in operating expenses, the weighted average debt service ratio would remain over 1.5 times. Combining the 200 basis point increase in rate and the 10% increase in operating expenses, the pro forma weighted average debt service ratio would still remain over 1.15 times. And all scenarios, these borrowers would be able to make payments. We remain comfortable with the low level of risk and the loan portfolio. Slide 14 outlined some additional credit metrics. Non-performing assets increased to a still low 59 basis points of assets, largely due to the three relationships previously discussed. The loan to value of the non-performing assets is less than 51%. Criticized and classified loans declined 4% quarter-over-quarter. The allowance for credit losses to loans ratio increased one basis point to 58 basis points. And the allocation reserves by loan type is depicted in the bottom right chart. Overall, we remain very comfortable with our credit risk profile and continue to expect minimal loss content. Our capital position is shown on Slide 15. Book value and tangible book value per share increased during the quarter. Despite the accumulated other comprehensive loss doubling during the quarter from the effects of the higher interest rates on the investment securities portfolio, 61% of earnings were returned to shareholder through dividends and share repurchases. The company repurchased over $8 million of common stock in the quarter. And the Board of Directors increase the share repurchase authorization by 1 million shares. The tangible common equity ratio declined to 7.82% driven mostly by higher rates. In the short and medium term, the company will manage with 8% tangible capital ratio. Before I turn it back to John, I wanted to provide some color on the outlook. The net interest income is a function of net interest margin and the balance sheet growth. With the pace and magnitude of interest rate increases, deposit costs are expected to rise at a higher pace than seen in the second quarter and thus we expect NIM pressure. Loan growth is dependent on the rate in economic environment and estimates remain in the low single digits. We previously expected core non-interest expense to increase by high single digits in 2022 from a base of $144 million. We now expect core noninterest expense to increase by mid-single digits given the result of the first half of the year. Quarterly noninterest expenses are expected to follow prior seasonal patterns. Lastly, the detective effective tax rate for 2022 should approximate 28%. With that, Iâll turn it back over to John.