Thanks, John, and good morning, everyone. From a financial perspective, we have a lot to cover. As John noted, I'll begin with Rockstar given the accounting treatment during the integration, then move to Alani and brand CELSIUS to walk through the components of our consolidated results. Beginning with Rockstar, during the quarter, we were actively integrating the brand into our supply chain, back office and commercial organization, which impacted how certain sales activities reflected under generally accepted accounting principles. As a result, some components were required to be recorded in other income rather than net sales. For the quarter, $45 million was recorded within net sales and an additional $6 million was recorded in other income. As we move into the first quarter, we expect to fully transition the U.S. portion of the business to the finished goods model and we expect that only the Canadian portion will remain in the other income. We expect the Canadian portion of transition to the finished goods model in the first half of 2026. On a full year basis, we recorded $56 million in net sales for Rockstar and an additional $13 million in other income. And as we sit here 6 to 8 weeks into 2026, we remain confident the brand continues to resonate with many consumers, and we have a plan to stabilize the business and move it back into growth over the next handful of years as previously discussed. Turning to Alani Nu, during the fourth quarter, Alani achieved record net sales of $370 million, benefiting from significant ongoing customer demand, increased distribution points and increased orders as we move the business out of its prior distribution system and into the PepsiCo distribution system. On a pro forma basis, that would equate to growth of 136% for the quarter compared to the prior year. In the 9 months since we purchased the brand, Alani has contributed $1 billion to our net sales. During the quarter, we continued to execute against the integration plan we presented in May, and we are pleased to note we remain on track, including moving the business into our supply chain, back office and commercial operations. We have also moved a substantial portion of the distribution network into the Pepsi system, with only a few pieces of the DSD network remaining outside of Pepsi today. Moving a substantial portion of the business into Pepsi was a significant operational milestone, and I want to recognize the teams across our organization, our former distribution partners and Pepsi for making that happen as seamlessly as it did. We also saw the execution show up in innovation. Cherry Bomb, our first Alani LTO launched in the Pepsi system, and was very successful running out in record time. With strong pull-through, we saw increased orders in the last few weeks of the year above and beyond our initial projections, supporting triple-digit growth in the first 6 to 8 weeks of the year. As we look across 2026, we expect continued expansion into more locations with more SKUs and overall triple-digit space gains. As expected, the transition of Alani into Pepsi drove increased orders and strong execution, which in turn impacted reported results for brand CELSIUS as we manage the timing and sequencing of inventory movements within the Pepsi system as we balance the Alani load-in with total inventory across the network. As a result, scanner data is a healthy 12.8% for the quarter, while underlying GAAP sales for CELSIUS showed a 7.7% decline due to the timing activities noted. When combining brand CELSIUS inventory movements with the Alani load-in, the company had a net benefit of approximately $25 million. Just a year ago, we were coming off a period in which both the category and brand CELSIUS experienced pressure in the back half of 2024, with some continued softness in the first quarter of 2025. As a result, we put a plan in place across our commercial organization, and we are pleased by the improvements seen since then where tracked sales are more aligned with the upper range of the energy category growth. As a result, for the full year, brand CELSIUS delivered $1.46 billion of net sales, growing 7.5% year-over-year. So combining everything for the fourth quarter, consolidated revenue was approximately $722 million and full year consolidated revenue was $2.5 billion, including having 2 billion-dollar brands. Taking a step down the P&L, for the 3 months ended December 31, 2025, gross profit increased by $175.1 million to $341.8 million from $166.7 million for the prior year period. Gross profit margin was 47.4%, compared to 50.2% in the prior year period, reflecting dilution from Rockstar Energy, higher cost of product related to integration costs and tariffs, partially offset by improved outbound freight, lower consolidation billbacks as a percentage of revenue and favorable product impact mix. As previously discussed, gross margin was impacted by onetime integration and distribution transition costs associated with the timing and sequencing of integrating Alani Nu and Rockstar and transitioning Alani into the Pepsi DSD system. While operational efficiencies and revenue growth management will be ongoing initiatives, we continue to expect the Alani integration to be completed by the end of the first quarter of 2026, and we expect the Rockstar integration to be completed in the first half of 2026. As integrations progress and ongoing initiatives take hold, we expect margins to expand across 2026 and return to a more normalized profile, with gross margins in the low 50s driven by savings across raw materials, scrap, manufacturing tolling fees, freight and package and brand mix, offset in part by tariffs and aluminum costs. For the full year, gross profit increased by (sic) [ at ] approximately $1.27 billion, from $680 million in 2024. Gross profit margin increased by 20 basis points from the prior year to 50.4% in 2025. Sales and marketing expense in the fourth quarter was $249.2 million or 34.5% of sales, and administrative expense was $66.6 million or 9.2% of sales. Adjusted for distributor termination and integration costs of $81 million, sales and marketing expense in the fourth quarter was 23.3% of sales, and administrative expense was 8.5% of sales when adjusting for $5 million in acquisition and integration costs. On a GAAP basis, we reported a net income of $24.7 million for the quarter. On a non-GAAP basis, adjusted EBITDA was $134.1 million, up from $62.9 million in the prior year period. Adjusted SG&A for the quarter was 31.8% of sales. For the full year, sales and marketing expense was $876.3 million or 34.8% of sales, and administrative expense was $250 million or 9.9% of sales. Adjusted for distributor termination and integration costs of $327.5 million, the full year sales and marketing expense was 21.8% of sales, and administrative expense was 7.5% of sales when adjusting for $60.2 million of acquisition and integration and other costs. Adjusted SG&A for the year was 29.4% of sales. We had an adjusted EBITDA margin of approximately 18.6% for the quarter. For the full year, on a GAAP basis, we reported net income of $108 million, and adjusted EBITDA was $619.6 million, representing an adjusted EBITDA margin of approximately 24.6%. On cash flow and the balance sheet, we remain focused on free cash flow generation and working capital discipline. We ended the year with $399 million in cash and approximately $670 million in total debt. Operating cash flow was $359 million. Working capital reflects the timing dynamics we discussed earlier, including inventory positioning and customer order cadence during the transition period. As cadence normalizes, we expect working capital volatility to moderate. On capital deployment, we remain focused on 3 priorities. One, investing to support brand growth and integration execution. Two, strengthening the balance sheet. And three, returning capital to shareholders. During the quarter, we reduced debt by approximately $200 million and repurchased $40 million of shares. We ended the period with $260 million remaining under our share repurchase program. We will continue to evaluate repurchase activity based on cash generation, market conditions and capital priorities while preserving flexibility for strategic M&A opportunities. As we look at 2026, I want to briefly frame how we are thinking about cadence and variability following an active fourth quarter. As I mentioned, the fourth quarter included integration and distribution transition activity that we expected, and those actions created timing effects within the Pepsi network. At times, reported results can vary when shipments, inventory positioning and promotions are not perfectly aligned with consumer takeaway. When that occurs, it is typically a function of timing and sequencing, and we will continue to be clear about what we believe is transitory versus what we believe reflects underlying trends. As we progress through the first half of 2026, we expect those impacts to moderate as integration milestones are completed. We remain focused on tightening alignment between shipments and underlying takeaway where possible, while recognizing that periods of integration and large customer ordering cycles can still create some quarter-to-quarter variability. On pricing and revenue growth management, we are taking a portfolio approach with greater precision and ROI discipline. Revenue growth management for us is not about broad-based price increases. It's about shaping the business through mix, price pack architecture by channel, pack strategy, and disciplined promotion to improve both growth and quality of earnings. As we scale, we are tailoring price pack architecture by channel, sharpening priority periods and using data to allocate investment where it drives the highest return. Over time, this should lead to promotional activity that is tighter, more intentional and more measurable. In addition, aligned planning and the captaincy with Pepsi support more consistent end market execution and a more repeatable commercial playbook across retailers. With that, I'll turn the call back to the operator to open the line for questions.