Gregory A. Sigrist
Thank you, Brett. As a reminder, all financial results shared today are preliminary pending our previously disclosed restatement. All results for comparison purposes reflect the new accounting methodology for the held-for-investment consumer loan portfolio with impacted balances totaling $191 million at June 30. We're very pleased with our third quarter results that show the impact of our strategy. Our focus on balance sheet optimization has contributed to increasing net interest income over the past few years. We are encouraged by the stability of our net interest income and net interest margin when compared to the prior year. Net interest margin in the quarter was 7.43% and adjusted net interest margin, which includes rate-related card expenses associated with deposits on the balance sheet was 5.98%, both of these expanded from last year's quarter, which were 7.26% and 5.76%, respectively, and when you compare them to the March quarter, which were 7.12% and 5.72%, respectively. Noninterest income grew 11% from the prior year. Tax solutions continued to produce results that outperformed last year's quarter and secondary market revenue and card and deposit fees were also higher. Secondary market revenue is benefiting from our balance sheet optimization strategy, part of which focuses on originating loans that have optionality and can generate fee income. As a reminder, we are generally targeting quarterly secondary market revenues in the range of $5 million to $7 million. Expenses in the quarter were elevated as we continue to invest in technology and compliance, which I indicated last quarter would occur in the back half of the year. This can be seen in the occupancy and equipment expense line, which includes our technology costs as well as legal and consulting fees. We expect legal and consulting fees to remain elevated in the fourth quarter and then to taper off into fiscal year 2026. Deposits held on the company's balance sheet at June 30 declined from a year ago, primarily due to the timing of when the quarter ended and the runoff of EIP deposits. Custodial deposits held at partner banks on June 30 were $431 million, an increase from $353 million a year ago. Loans and leases at June 30 increased when compared to last year. As Brett mentioned, this represents pretty significant growth since our prior year's total loan balance included insurance premium finance loans, which were sold earlier this year. Additionally, the yield on new originations on commercial finance loans during the quarter was 9.55% as compared to the March quarter yield on average balances of 8.24%. Our allowance for credit loss, excluding our seasonal tax service lending was 160 basis points in the quarter with an annualized net charge-off rate in the quarter of 52 basis points. As we mentioned before, our NPL ratio can be a bit lumpy from time to time, but then recover in the next quarter or 2 as the loans either return to performing or we are able to recover the collateral. In the June quarter, the increase in nonperforming loans was driven by three loans in different loan verticals. One was related to fraud, but is well collateralized relative to carrying value. And the other two, we expect to either return to accrual status or to result in recovery that will cover the majority of, if not the full balance. This is what makes our commercial finance team so successful, how we remain comfortable with our credit book and why we focus on the net charge-off rate versus NPL ratio. Our liquidity remains strong with almost $2.7 billion available. This is higher than where we were last year at this time, and we're extremely pleased with our position. During the quarter, we were able to repurchase approximately 604,000 shares at an average price of $74.49. This brings year-to-date repurchases to almost 1.9 million shares. Based on our preliminary analysis, this accounting change should have a negative impact on net income in fiscal 2022 and 2023, primarily due to the increase in provision that will be recognized early in the life of the contracts as the portfolios ramped up. The inflection point appears to be 2024 when the impact of the recognized credit enhancements began to flow through as the portfolios approach a steady state, thus producing higher net income. However, should these portfolios remain in this steady state, we would expect them to have a more muted impact on fiscal fourth quarter 2025 and full year 2026. Therefore, for fiscal year 2025, we are expecting a preliminary EPS range of $7.50 to $7.80. This includes the following assumptions: one rate cut in fiscal Q4 of 2025, an effective tax rate of 16% to 20%. For fiscal year '26, we are introducing a preliminary EPS range of $8.25 to $8.75, which includes the following assumptions: no rate cuts during the year, an effective tax rate of 18% to 22% and guidance for fiscal year 2025 and fiscal year 2026 includes expected share repurchases. I'd like to reiterate again that these are preliminary numbers pending the outcome of our restatement. This concludes our prepared remarks. Operator, please open the line for questions.