Thank you, Greg. Turning first to our oncology study with BB-401, this is a Phase 2 clinical study designed as an open-label study to explore the safety, tolerability and efficacy of BB-401 following intra-tumoral injections. BB-401 is intended to produce a single strand antisense RNA directed to inhibit the expression of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor or EGFR a protein when stimulated induces cell differentiation and proliferation and has been known to be significantly amplified in cancer cells. BB-401 will be administered into the target lesion once a week for up to eight weeks, in up to 30 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck known as HNSCC. These are patients who are refractory to all standard therapies such as surgery, chemotherapy and immunotherapy. We continue to make good progress in starting up the study. Our first site Chris O'Brien Lifehouse is active and we hope to have other sites active and our first patient enrolled in the near future. In addition, we now have regulatory approval from the Ministry of Health in Russia and hope to have the Russian site active during the month of June. In total, we anticipate using five to eight clinical sites in Australia and Russia. The primary outcome of the trial will measure the size of the size of the lesion using techniques such as CT and MRI. A positive response from BB-401 treatment is thus to reduce the overall size of the tumor or completely ablate the lesion. Additionally, we’ll be looking at secondary endpoints such as progression free survival, overall survival, duration of response, disease control rate, safety and tolerability. In addition, we will be monitoring molecular markers and biobsolete lesions to monitor the presence of BB-401and the antisense RNA produced from the vector as well as the result of impacts on EGFR levels. This study has a two-stage design which allows the stopping the study based on either futility of success at the end of the first stage or after twelve patients have been enrolled, and monitored through the primary outcome measure assuming enrollment rates was expected the interim analysis is anticipated to occur around the end of this calendar year. I’ll now touch on where we stand from a regulatory and clinical perspective with our program to treat oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy or OPMD. We are developing BB-301 as a therapeutic to treat dysphagia associated with OPMD. The disease symptoms of OPMD varied depending on severity, rate of progression and pathophysiology. The current symptoms include ptosis, dysphagia and leg weakness. It’s the dysphagia the impaired swallowing function that causes the majority of serious health problems to patients with OPMD. As the disease progresses, the incidences of hospitalization due to aspiration and the seriousness of the results of lung infections significantly decreased quality of life and can be life threatening in addition malnutrition also factored into the equation. As currently written, the clinical study for BB-301 will be in patients clinically and genetically diagnosed with OPMD who have an impairment in swallowing function. Patients will receive a single intra-muscular dose of BB-301 into the cricopharyngeal muscle in the throat. This clinical protocol is designed as a dose-escalation study. So we enroll patients at increasing doses with a time period between each cohort to ensure to stay before we proceed to the next dose. Once we reach the top dose, or define a dose that is the maximally effective dose, we’ll enroll an additional number of patients. All patients will be following for a year on this study. The primary endpoint is safety and tolerability. However, because these are patients we will also be looking at quantitative clinical improvement in swallowing, as well as patient reported improvements in swallowing and quality of life. We met last month face-to-face with our OPMD Clinical Advisory Board to update our clinical plans and finalize the clinical protocol design. This group is comprised with key opinion leaders and doctors to help manage treatment options for OPMD patients as well as a separate group of experts in the quantitative assessment of swallowing. With their input, we are designing this first clinical study in such a way that we hope that we’ll maximize our opportunities to success and give us the positive time forward to approval. Turning to regulatory advances on this program. It’s important, especially for gene therapy products and to this novel silence and replace approach, that we discussed our IND enabling studies and clinical plans with the regulatory agencies. This is to improve the likelihood that BB-301 will pass all the regulatory requirements to enter the clinic. With this in mind, over the past two quarters, we have met and discussed our plans for BB-301 with the regulatory agencies in key OPMD countries such as the U.S., Canada, and in this last quarter, France. The BB-301 development plan was well received and there was a high level of enthusiasm for the ingenuity of a single vector approach that can silence disease causing genes and simultaneously express a novel healthy copy of the same gene. The feedback from these meetings has been incorporated into the clinical study design, as well as the ongoing IND enabling work. We feel we are well positioned now to progress BB-301 into the clinic. The pathway has been set and it is now just the time it takes to complete the required toxicology and manufacturing work to support a high quality regulatory filing. I’ll now turn over to David Suhy to describe the ongoing toxicology and manufacturing work with BB-301.